IMMIGRATION thread

[Viking]

He doesn't seem to be talking about Muslims (or cultural markers in general), but about pigmentation levels. In other words: likely motivated by racism.

(and for record: most Jews in Europe are surely 'white' (which is a really stupid term))

[Kadagar_AV]

He doesn't seem to be talking about Muslims (or cultural markers in general), but about pigmentation levels. In other words: likely motivated by racism.

(and for record: most Jews in Europe are surely 'white' (which is a really stupid term))

Uh, no.

I am talking about unemployment, terrorism, shortage of infrastructure, collapse of the welfare state with mutual trust... yadda yadda...

You don't have to go racist to understand why you don't want hundreds of thousands African or Arab immigrants a year, most with low to non-existant education and from bad cultures with war traumas...



What I am WORRIED about is the reaction when the Swedish people have had enough. We already have a social climate several thousand degrees colder than when I grew up. People no longer TRUST their fellow countrymen - and why?

Quite frankly, because they use rusted daggers to mutilate girls vaginas, because they are at large impossible to have functioning on a western market economy, because they scream ALLAHU AKBAR when we have free speech seminars at our universities...

The problems are real, but you of course prefer to blaim the problems on the "racists". That is just absolutely idiotic.

This is from our most revered university... The problems are because of racism, did I read you right?

[Viking]

Uh, no.

I am talking about unemployment, terrorism, shortage of infrastructure, collapse of the welfare state with mutual trust... yadda yadda...

You don't have to go racist to understand why you don't want hundreds of thousands African or Arab immigrants a year, most with low to non-existant education and from bad cultures with war traumas...

Irrelevant. You chose to refer to people based on their pigmentation levels ('black' and 'white') rather than their background - i.e. culture and nationality (and just now: biological ethnicity). This more or less implies that their pigmentation level (or their biology in general) is a problem in itself; as if one could not expect people with this and that pigmentation level to behave other than so and so.

Look at it this way: if you could only chose between two words to describe Hitler, 'white guy' and 'Nazi', which one would you chose?

[Kadagar_AV]

Irrelevant. You chose to refer to people based on their pigmentation levels ('black' and 'white') rather than their background - i.e. culture and nationality (and just now: biological ethnicity). This more or less implies that their pigmentation level (or their biology in general) is a problem in itself; as if one could not expect people with this and that pigmentation level to behave other than so and so.

Look at it this way: if you could only chose between two words to describe Hitler, 'white guy' and 'Nazi', which one would you chose?

Look at it this way... you automatically scream "RACISM" when someone questions or argues against mass immigration from the Middle east and Africa.

You have no arguments as to why it would be a GOOD idea to let them in, oh no. You just scream "BLOODY MURDERER" at anyone awake enough to understand Europe has dire problems.

[Removed Farmyard Animals]

[Viking]

^ what he says

@ Swordmaster

You can't learn from history, the conditions in what it took place can't jusf be slapped upon wildly different circumstances.

Certain mechanisms have a tendency of repeating, so yes; it is possible to learn from history - it's just that it's a bad bet to look for an exact repeat of a scenario.

You have no arguments as to why it would be a GOOD idea to let them in, oh no. You just scream "BLOODY MURDERER" at anyone awake enough to understand Europe has dire problems.

I've most recently argued against mass-immigration from those very areas. You are missing the point completely.

You seem think that in order to to accuse someone who opposes immigration of racism, you have to be supportive of immigration yourself - which is rather obviously nonsense.

[Fragony]

Certain mechanisms have a tendency of repeating, so yes; it is possible to learn from history - it's just that it's a bad bet to look for an exact repeat of a scenario.

That's like altering the sum to reach an outcome. This is without prescedent, in the Roman times there were major shifts of people moving and settling, but that took centuries, I am sure you can find a timelapse somewhere,.

[a completely inoffensive name]

Out of all the challenges Europe has ever faced, this is the one that ends its hegemony?

You people made great strides to open borders and reduce arms in an effort towards inter-European peace and now you are all tripping over how to treat these long distance migrants?

You have no duty to these people. Every one of you lot that called US/UK policy in the region callous when these same countries we destabilized sent the US into recession in the 1970s as soon as they realized they could embargo enough oil to fuck with us.

[Kadagar_AV]

Certain mechanisms have a tendency of repeating, so yes; it is possible to learn from history - it's just that it's a bad bet to look for an exact repeat of a scenario.




I've most recently argued against mass-immigration from those very areas. You are missing the point completely.

You seem think that in order to to accuse someone who opposes immigration of racism, you have to be supportive of immigration yourself - which is rather obviously nonsense.

What exactly is racism to you?

I vehemently dislike having Arabs, Africans and Gypsies around me, in the place where I live.

It does not mean I don't treat every person I meet with respect, it does not mean I don't do my best to integrate them to my society, it does not mean I am not willing to help them create better living conditions for themselves in their home states...

But see, I dislike having Gypsies around me, not Romanians or Bulgarians, as an example. And Gypsies come from Romania and Bulgaria.

I have several Romanian and Bulgarian friends, but yes, one of the ethnic cultures in Romania and Bulgaria I don't like.


And why? Because Gypsies is a pure parasitic culture that is straight out said EVIL to the people following it, and generally negative on the society they dwell in.

Is that racist?

I find it problematic that we to Sweden import people from cultures with a long history of inbreeding and "quantity above quality" so to say when it comes to creating a second generation...

Is that because I am racist, or because I am SO bored with teaching math to these stupid people, all the while seeing the population and the politicians running around with their arms in the air wondering why the school results are sinking like a stone.

*not teaching anymore, I should add, because I left teaching for this exact reason. I didn't become a teacher to deal with problems like this, I would honestly say around 30% of my work time was dealing with immigration problems (in various ways), I joined politics instead of teaching to get to the root with the problem*

Heck, that 10 year old girl I had, who was about to have her vagina mutilated in Africa, with me unable to stop it even though calling the social service, police, and so on still haunts me.

I have time and time again on these boards said that I believe the world would be a better place if around 10% of the population in every country was foreign - spread from all over the world.

However, that is NOT what we are seeing.

Am I racist?

Maybe, I don't know...

I think the human race evolved, and then split up because of various reasons. We are still the same RACE though - humans.

With that said, I also believe that all dogs are dogs... But let us remember that we still have Berner Blanc Suisse and Chihuahuas, and those have evolved on a time period WAY shorter than humanitys history.

My point is that when I decided to get a dog, well, guess my pick.

And it's not that I am a racist that HATE other dog breeds. I think German Shepherds are also cool, Border Collies are intelligenter than my dogs breed, and Poodles can do circus numbers to make you laugh all day...


With that said however, I wouldn't ever get a Chihuahua, because they are less intelligent, they take WAY more training before they stop pooping indoors, and they bark at the mailman even though he is just doing his job.

[Viking]

What exactly is racism to you?

Being prejudiced based on biology. If you don't want to let people with IQ less than a certain threshold into the country; then you should give applicants IQ tests, not look at their pigmentation levels (and if you are really worried about IQ levels, then you should also test ethnic Swedes and expel those with low scores).

With that said however, I wouldn't ever get a Chihuahua, because they are less intelligent, they take WAY more training before they stop pooping indoors, and they bark at the mailman even though he is just doing his job.

But then you would have to prove it. Given that our knowledge of human biology is at a premature stage, this likely not possible for the moment. All kinds of factors can influence how people end up - whether things like aggressiveness or intelligence. Nutrition could influence, education could influence; and effects could accumulate over generations. Until we can provide decent estimates on how people are going to behave solely from DNA, the case for linking behaviour with biological ethnicity will be weak, because the possible contributing factors will be hard to separate.

If two populations largely live segregated, then the non-biological factors can vary a lot between the two populations. If they do not live segregated, then they would likely interbreed and soon there would no longer exist two separate populations to study. So that's why you want to understand the DNA if you want to get to the bottom of it.