Britain's monarch is kind of a permanent version of a democratic politician: she's in power because people want her and can do whatever she wants, but if it comes to pass that she pisses enough of her own people she's liable to be removed, violently if need be.We don't have an unelected Monarch who has all these powers to turn the country into a monarchy again or can reign in almost any decision of the elected politicians as PVC described and Greyblades and Pape apparently verified.
Or maybe the queen can't actually do all that in reality and then she is rather powerless in reality, how can both be true?
Last edited by Greyblades; 10-01-2015 at 19:46.
Being better than the worst does not inherently make you good. But being better than the rest lets you brag.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks