Quote Originally Posted by Greyblades View Post
No it doesnt. It indicates that the Legal consequences of rape accusations are minimal.
So what indicates the opposite for the non-legal? That feminists take such things seriously? What a paradox you place yourself in.

If they dont hear a word of the matter. If they do, like say through the internet or social media, it is highly damaging to the accused reputation and may result in termination of employment.
Most employers overreact at any legal trouble on a low-level employee's part. This has nothing to do with your position.

My point being that the USA putting all sexual crimes, from misemeanours like groping to felonies like rape, all under one umbrella term is highly detrimental to the statistic's value in this argument.
It's not clear that you understand what the figure actually encompasses.

...he's not arguing about the rape kit's usefulness he's arguing the rape kit's price. Which was a consequence of having free market healthcare not this "rape culture"

Seriously do you even finish reading before you start replying?
The free market does not pay for rape kit tests as I plainly said.

Alcohol is and has long been humanity's most powerful external tool for sellf replication. To automatically assume that intoxication percludes consent results in absurdity; if that was true at least 50% of all men and women in recorded history who have bred are rapists, including a good number of your ancestors.
It is not a very ambiguous legal standard.

If they have a history of agreeing to fuck every man/woman in sight it would add validity to an argument in court that the prosecution was doing the same with this one, only they regretted it later.
And how do you figure that? Your common sense again?