Safe side of what? What rule does it break?As moderator I felt it better to delete the video to stay on the safe side.
Safe side of what? What rule does it break?As moderator I felt it better to delete the video to stay on the safe side.
Don't see it either but it isn't a democracy here, we were at a dead end (olol) anyway. Thread can as well be closed.
One could say that a holocaust denial is usually inaccurate, hateful and used to harass people, it is also against a law.knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. Posting of copyrighted material, unless the copyright is owned by you or by The Org, is discouraged. The Org expects its patrons to remain civil even in the face of disagreements. Any kind of "flaming", slurs, or insults -- addressed to either an individual or a group -- is extremely inappropriate. Please respect etiquette at all times.
And as if that weren't enough, it is an insult addressed to a group that is very inflammatory.
Whether you see it that way or not, moderators have often deleted certain inflammatory content to prevent fights and to be on the safe side.
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Tricky one eh.
Why is there the impression that there must be two links.
Is it because people are denying the actual content of the one link that was posted therefore the logical explaination to make those denials true would be that there must have really been two videos which have both been deleted.
I am sure the moderator who deleted the single link because of its contents can clarify that it was one link and that it contained the little details which some are still claiming were not present, he could probably also clear it up by referencing the times of each detail which people deny are present in the interview, sort of like 9:20, 10:30 , 43:10, 54:30 kind of thing![]()
That thought is creeping up on me as well. The link I saw was an interview with a guy who's house was raided, he wouldn't be in such a facebook group if he wasn't a nazi-symphatiser but I saw no holocaust denial whatsoever, just a description of the raid. As for threats, the guys in black iron bars are antifa, you are German you know who they are. We have them here as well but not nearly as violent as in Germany, more like hobbyists
In any case, holocaust denial is illegal in Germany (which I find stupid), but glorifying nazis is not
Last edited by Fragony; 08-30-2016 at 16:54.
In the video in question there was a speaker who was advocating that listeners read the works of a known Holocaust denier. While it wasnt outright Holocaust denial, I felt it best to delete it not just because of the topic but because the video was causing a lot of tensions here. Although it seems like it didnt do any good.![]()
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Oh, we are talking about that nazi group video with the German whose house got raided? The one from last months that I forgot about and didn't watch because it's 1 hour and 21 minutes long? I won't argue about the legitimacy of that guy's case, I just want to leave this here:
http://www.theonion.com/infographic/...lt-right-53747
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
You might just be right, we have never been talking about the same video probably. haven't seen the video you refer to either. But I can absolutily guaranty that video isn't the video that Greyblades posted, his hands are perfectly clean and doesn't deserve the insinuations
Last edited by Fragony; 08-30-2016 at 17:18.
Bookmarks