9/11

[Viking]

The glow was from the crucible, not the metal.

I just illustrated with the screenshots why this is an unlikely explanation.

In the first frame, all the aluminium is yellow, and there is little to no variation in colour between the aluminium in the pan and the aluminium that has just exited the crucible.

In the second frame, only the aluminium mid-air or currently exiting the crucible is uniformly yellow - the aluminium in the pan has a distinct silvery appearance. This despite the fact that the crucible has barely changed position between the two frames.

In other words, the cooling of the aluminium is the likely culprit: it is no longer hot enough to glow.

If this is incorrect, just provide a video where aluminium appearing yellow in the crucible appears silvery as it falls.

I fear you are woefully misinformed if you think the hard science and physics favours the reports.

I do not back up any report. That would not seem to be a particularly fruitful endeavour as a matter of principle - any report can contain errors and sloppy work.

Occam's razor just happens to be on the side of the people you term truths.

Occam's razor favours the simplest theory (it's one of many forms of bias); that's how it is defined. Often, the complexity of theories are easy to compare; other times, not so much.