Results 1 to 30 of 102

Thread: Gameroom policy discussion thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #21
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: Gameroom policy discussion thread

    The LoZ game on TWC, there was repeated and sustained cheating by a dead townie in the tags, for example. Same difference, using board functions to break the no communication after dead rule. And you can thank posts there and leave comments (rep system)

    It's banned on a lot of boards and in El Barto's game I think it was all innocent stuff, but at the same time, I see the issue with thanking posts in a mafia game because I've experienced similar things before, and it's banned on other sites for a reason, and people from other sites push all the boundaries, like if cyphers are allowed, they'll post cyphers and talk to each other in encrypted communications that they worked out prior to the game and it's all legal because it's not illegal. Just as an example.

    Happened during the champs series on 2+2 with people who were not natives to that board, since it was legal, it was allowed in the game and disallowed in future games.

    Basically the rule exists because people find new and innovative ways to break the spirit of the game, but not the rules which were laid out.

    And good for them, they're being creative. But I don't want that tactic used.
    Last edited by Askthepizzaguy; 03-05-2016 at 09:09.
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO