Gameroom policy discussion thread

[Zack]

A lot of words to say the nothing is changing. Typical bureaucracy!

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Dp101]

What is the daisy smiley meant to represent?

[Zack]

What is the daisy smiley meant to represent?

censored profanity

[Askthepizzaguy]

What? This policy is total , and if I weren't such an upstanding I'd tell you s to go daisy with a fish-smelling tablecloth!

in the alps! Son of a blackberry teakettle racecar hornswoggle with a pea soup-colored hair dryer!!!

Pineapple tin-can sizzle bacon!

Et cetera.

Obviously it's fine. Nevermind the above.

[GeneralHankerchief]

There's been some talk in the queue thread about provisionally moving back to two games at once. I'm kind of ambivalent about it, so I'll throw it to you guys to see what you think.

(Well, I'm ambivalent in the sense that if the games are scattered, i.e. signups for the second game begin around, say, D4 or D5 of the first game, it could go either way. Still strongly opposed to two games *not* being scattered.)

[Zack]

I think it's a bad idea. Maaaaaaybe if they're significantly staggered.

[Sooh]

I think, like Dragonmount, that this community isn't big enough at the moment for two games at the same time. I would like to reiterate the idea I had about starting sign-ups while one game is in progress, so that we can start a new one within a day or two of the previous one ending. If there are enough hosts who are able and willing, this should be possible to pull through.

[El Barto]

I think it's a bad idea. Maaaaaaybe if they're significantly staggered.

Define ‘significantly’, both in terms of Day/Night cycles and actual (RL) time.