"As for the term militant atheism which you seem to hear for the first time, it was not his coinage." Wrong again. But your "specialist" made a massive mistake in connecting making atheism a religion. So, I doubt of his analyse(s) which are at least biased.
These are his words: "militant atheism was the official religion". As atheism can't be a religion by definition, he had to build a analogy, to fabricate a bridge, reason why he involves the communist Party in it. Reason why I involved the
"random guy on the internet": You should have read the quote: It was about the attempt from religious to made atheism a religion...
Not because I need someone to analyse a text so biased that it is a piece of art, but because I find his text much better than mine.
As the work of your specialist, I admit I never read it. I went for French Specialists at my times...
"Not in the case of Lenin who fought religion and church being the head of the Soviet state" Really? 2 solutions; Some might think he wasn't so much against religions, or, some might think because he was against religions, he is in big need to save his soul. Whatever the reasons, I still don't understand why you bring this in the actual exchange...
Bookmarks