Brexit Thread

[Husar]

The only "evidence" present was an unverified claim about being educated and a statement which implied a lack of education.

First you draw a conclusion and then try to weasel out by saying you had not enough evidence for any proper conclusion.
Simple solution, don't make hasty conclusions if you lack "evidence", people might think you're a nasty person.

[Legs]

First you draw a conclusion and then try to weasel out by saying you had not enough evidence for any proper conclusion.
Simple solution, don't make hasty conclusions if you lack "evidence", people might think you're a nasty person.

Errrr no.
I draw a conclusion from the available evidence.
Additional evidence to support the conclusion is present in the first part of post #936
Since I stand by what I said and the conclusion I reached from the statements made where on earth are you getting the notion about weaseling out?
The last tory effort at concern for the working calss was the Big Society project...which was soon dropped and its final audit showed that the bulk of th funding went to the wealthiest ares rather than the poorer areas which were stated as the main focus of the project.
And you don't have to be a tory to know that , which raises further questions about Apaches claim.

[Legs]

Implicit in Legs' comments is the belief that if the right-wing working class were better educated they would be more left-wing and therefore would have voted In because all the right-wing out campaign had going for it was false promises.

And where do you reach that conclusion from? obviously it was not garnered from what was written.
Are you working off preconceptions and just basing your assesment on that and trying to make your point fit what you want it to fit ?

Oh, well we all know IA is educated, we can tell - having known him for a decade or more on average

Well I don't know that , in fact going by what was written by apache it seems the opposite is true.
So are you just going on preconceptions again young man?