I think it's fairly clear IA was referring to the Left, or the rich part of it at any rate, when he said:
If his observation about 19th Century Tories has any bearing on the above it is to ironically observe that the roles of Left and Right have become inverted.
What I struggle to understand is why Legs is contorting himself trying to come up with another explanation other than what IA clearly meant. Given how he's resorted to responding to my points with nothing but abuse I fail to see why he can't just accept that IA meant what he did and hurl abuse at him too.
Unless asking him to quote primary sources in an argument over scripture has just engendered an irrational hatred of me specifically.
Bookmarks