hello

[Legs]

The moderators are only there to provide an area for civil discourse.

How can there be civil discourse when the response consists of simply repeating such obvious lies?

It is not the place of the moderator to simply shutdown someones post because they agree/disagree with it

I disagreed with the moderators choice to delete the link, but I understand it, I also understanfd that there are legal issues concerning promotion of nazi ideology and denial of crimes against humanity(which covers the holocaust denial).

Moderators don't enforce right or wrong, they enforce civility and good conduct

Civility and good conduct would cover things like honesty and integrity wouldn't it, so where was the civility and good conduct on the part of those defending that neo nazi scum?

[Legs]

Funny stuff eh? After claiming the reference was not present we now get this.

Principle aside this was an overreaction, a 5 second reference by a noted crazy in an 100 minute interview with said crazy does not make it a video promoting holocaust denial and deleting it is the same type of kneejerk overreaction by local authority that I posted the video to criticize.

Now since the "crazy" recomended the "historian" as source material to explain the basis of his political ideology how is it not promoting holocaust denial?

[Husar]

How can there be civil discourse when the response consists of simply repeating such obvious lies?

There can't, you have to find other people to have a civil discourse with I guess.