PC Mode
Org Mobile Site
Forum > Discussion > Backroom (Political) >
Thread: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
Vuk 21:54 08-21-2016
Have you guys heard about the Disney remake of TOS? They needed to make some subtle changes to the characters to make them more original and relevant, but I like what I see.

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Dr. Billy Bones McCoy 2b.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	787.3 KB 
ID:	18835

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mr. William Scott 2b.jpg 
Views:	151 
Size:	937.7 KB 
ID:	18836

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Captain Kink and Mr. Spork 2b.jpg 
Views:	155 
Size:	985.4 KB 
ID:	18837

I don't know about you, but I think the characters look a lot more exciting and interesting this time around.

Reply
Gregoshi 00:41 08-22-2016
Nah, that is not Disney-ish stuff. Must be some other studio.

Reply
Vuk 00:44 08-22-2016
Originally Posted by Gregoshi:
Nah, that is not Disney-ish stuff. Must be some other studio.
Don't forget, Disney put out Apocalypto.

Reply
Papewaio 04:14 08-22-2016
So when did Disney buy CBS or Paramount?

Reply
lars573 06:23 08-22-2016
About the same time he drank enough to forget Kirk putting his Captains rod into any alien with a vagina. Or that Tasha was a robo-sexual. Or that Quark ran a holographic brothel. Or that Tom Paris made programs with sexy-time bits in them.


Also Discovery is not a TOS remake. At most it's TOS's DS9/Voyager. It just happens to use rejected concept art of the Movie refit for the Enterprise.

Reply
Vuk 13:43 08-22-2016
Originally Posted by lars573:
About the same time he drank enough to forget Kirk putting his Captains rod into any alien with a vagina. Or that Tasha was a robo-sexual. Or that Quark ran a holographic brothel. Or that Tom Paris made programs with sexy-time bits in them.


Also Discovery is not a TOS remake. At most it's TOS's DS9/Voyager. It just happens to use rejected concept art of the Movie refit for the Enterprise.
Who's talking about Discovery?

Reply
Up
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO