Futuramafia [Concluded]

**Riedquat** · 10-05-2016, 19:57

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Basically here's my order of precedence in terms of who I'm saving.

GH > Riedquat > Monty > Pizza > Dp > atheotes > Pelican > Al Sips > Murska

GH > Riedquat

I've already told you, you have a faulty cpu!

**Zack** · 10-05-2016, 19:59

Tally as of post 2815:

Lynch votes
3 votes: Murska (GeneralHankerchief, Askthepizzaguy, Dp101)
3 votes: Al Sipsclar (atheotes, Murska, Montmorency)
2 votes: Askthepizzaguy (Pelican, Riedquat)

not voting - @Al Sipsclar

Voting ends in:

Voting history:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-05-2016, 20:03

@Pelican @Al Sipsclar @atheotes

One or two of you are town. We need everyone on the same train. A 3 way split can't win this game.

**Riedquat** · 10-05-2016, 20:06

Vote: Murska weird...

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-05-2016, 20:06

The scums voting for Al Sipsclar tells me that Al's alignment, scum or not, will not affect the scum's likelihood of winning this game.

If he's scum, they're bussing the least valuable member of their team.

**Montmorency** · 10-05-2016, 20:08

Yes, that's what I said.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-05-2016, 20:11

Isoing atheotes again.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-05-2016, 20:14

At this point, the only way to really read Pelican/Al is to look at everyone else in the game first and see if you run out of spaces to put either another townie, or another scum.

Al+atheotes+Murska is not the team, in my opinion. Monty's in it.

If Al is in it, you kick atheotes out of it. That's why I gotta look at atheotes and see if there's anything I can reliably read.

Does anyone else want to try it, so it's not just me doing the iso?

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-05-2016, 20:22

I'm doing the iso separately, I don't want this part lost in the wall.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...post2053715270

Originally Posted by atheotes

I dont like any of the quoted posts. I feel that Murska has been coasting without any follow up on his comments.

atheotes noted Murska's behavior earlier than just about anyone. But this is the critical day, no more time at all, and atheotes unwilling to lynch Murska.

That looks like distancing. How can Murska's behavior be so scummy to atheotes that he notes a big line of his bad behavior, but the follow up is not existent when it's critical, and when there's a slam dunk case on Murska exists.

That's a major problem. If atheotes refuses to lynch Murska under any circumstance, he's always scum with Murska.

I'll keep digging to see if I find anything that contradicts that.