There's two people on Pizza that probably aren't going to change.
There's three other votes spread around, two of them from people who have lodged utterly WTF votes and promise to come back later to "closer examine the situation".
If Monty switches to Pizza then atheotes and Al Sipsclar could very well jump out of friggin nowhere and put the killshot in on Pizza.
So we're dependent on Monty - whose feelings towards Pizza are pretty well known - and atheotes, who has been top of the class at the Charlie Day School of Wild Card Philosophy, in the final rounds.
I don't think I've ever seen the future more clearly in my life.
Originally Posted by Dp101: Al, get on Murska, NOW. You called him mafia, and we lose if the votes are spread. We need to vote together or mafia will just switch last second.
It's a pretty blatant distancing attempt/hedge. I think you'll have better luck appealing to Monty. Maybe atheotes if Pelican is our third.
Look, if I don't think Murska is scum, then this is a loss anyway. I'm fatalistic about these things. I mean, I tried - what more do you want? A dayvig pulled out of my butt, killing one and lynching the next? I've said what I could and every time Pizza gets stronger. Al Sipsclar drops a scorn vote and you can't even be bothered to make his wagon happen.
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy: Post immediately after that:
Winston wasn't scum, Pizza isn't scum, Novice wasn't scum, choxorn wasn't scum, Monty is scummy as hell, Cuth was town, Stork was not scum, Pelican town-read seems consensus-y. atheotes is not scum hunting here, because anyone who could be scum is nowhere near is radar.
I have suspected some townies. voted for some. My top suspect is yet to be resolved though
But you...voted for every townie that has been lynched. Unable to find any scum through tracking. have you suddenly become so poor at reading the game? I dont think so.
There is no explanation for why are you still alive other than you being scum. Reason i am not voting you is because of the Winston-JHT track result you provided and I dont think it makes sense for scum tracker.
wow...D1 rvs vote is part of your analysis.
one softclaim bothers you but the other is a major scum tell. Scum have cover roles. Townies dont.
I have made my case on GH. My case on GH is a "possible" one as you say. when are townies cases ever conclusive? Yet you are sure he is town. Based on what?
Murska has been scummy. but not the top of my POE. I am more positive about Al because of his iso and the omgus vote post.
Anyways, i need to go now. I know i am one of the reasons this is only a possible LYLO.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Zack:
Young lady, I am an expert on humans. Now pick a mouth, open it, and say BR BR BR BR BRRRRRRRR.
The Town achieves victory based on its ability to achieve the goals listed below.
- The Mafia are eliminated.
- All hostile Third Parties are eliminated.
- At least one member of the Town survives the game.
Abilities:
Hardy Carapace (1-shot protection).Nightkill immunity on Night 1. This is a passive ability and it triggers automatically. If you are not attacked Night 1, you can choose to give it to someone else on any of the following nights and they will be protected.
I'm going to be so pissed off if we lose because of a random vote. I mean, there is a decent chance that GH is allied with Pizza given the former's attitude towards the latter today, but if so then I'm really not sure who the final town could be.
So, hi mafia, you all gonna switch onto al at :59, right? And then I get to be salty? Alternatively Pizza and General are mafia and Murska is innocent, and then I get to be more salty.
Originally Posted by Dp101: So, hi mafia, you all gonna switch onto al at :59, right? And then I get to be salty? Alternatively Pizza and General are mafia and Murska is innocent, and then I get to be more salty.
Al sips is a better lynch than Murska. Just check the post where he voted me
If any town are still not on Murska, please switch. Regardless of if it is the right choice, we need to have 5 on one candidate or we lose no matter what. If we have 4 and 1, then mafia can always lynch the 1 (unless both are mafia, but unlikely). However, if we have 5 then we only lose if the guy with 5 on them is town. The point I'm trying to make is that having 4 on 1 always results in a loss.