Tokens of My Confection [Concluded]

[Scarlett Aria]

After Tak's hydra game, I don't think I'll ever see another cop result claim without breaking into a cold sweat.

It wasn't that bad.. I find this to be a bit townie.

[Askthepizzaguy]

It wasn't that bad.. I find this to be a bit townie.

<------Where my cursor moves when I was typing Winston.
The fakepeek, or Winst
on's reaction? <------Where I have to start typing again to make everything go onto the same line.

Org doing that thing again. I bolded my actual comment because this post is now super messed up.

[Scarlett Aria]

<------Where my cursor moves when I was typing Winston.
The fakepeek, or Winst
on's reaction? <------Where I have to start typing again to make everything go onto the same line.

Org doing that thing again. I bolded my actual comment because this post is now super messed up.

Winston's comment that I responded too.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Winston's comment that I responded too.

Seems like a pretty forced read.

[Scarlett Aria]

Seems like a pretty forced read.

How? I just got out of two back to back scum games. I'm glad to not Rand it this game or I would run for the hills.

[Synecdoche]

Tally as of post 113:

Lynch votes
3 votes: Zack (Montmorency, El Barto, Cuthillius)
2 votes: Al Sipsclar (BSmith, Riedquat)
2 votes: Askthepizzaguy (Dp101, Newyn)
2 votes: Dp101 (Winston Hughes, Zack)
1 votes: El Barto (Sooh)
1 votes: GeneralHankerchief (seireikhaan)
1 votes: Newyn (Choxorn)
1 votes: Montmorency (Al Sipsclar)
1 votes: seireikhaan (GeneralHankerchief)
1 votes: Scarlett Aria (NotACop)
1 votes: Cuthillius (Scarlett Aria)

Voting history:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

GeneralHankerchief

Askthepizzaguy

Zack

Montmorency

Montmorency

GeneralHankerchief

Montmorency

El Barto

Al Sipsclar

Al Sip

Riedquat

Askthepizzaguy

Zack

El Barto

Askthepizzaguy

Newyn

Dp101

seireikhaan

Al Sipsclar

Scarlett Aria

El Barto

GeneralHankerchief

Zack

Cuthillius

Cuthillius

Dp101

Time Until End of Day 1/Start of Night 1

[Zack]

How? I just got out of two back to back scum games. I'm glad to not Rand it this game or I would run for the hills.

your response is like a total non sequitur

[Montmorency]

your response is like a total non sequitur

It's even worse than what you and Barto did. In fact, it's almost as bad as you pointing it out now.

[Scarlett Aria]

your response is like a total non sequitur

lol, you think that is uncharacteristic of my play?

[Askthepizzaguy]

I need to share this with people. Especially Takhisis since he will probably orgasm.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Winston Hughes]

I need to share this with people. Especially Takhisis since he will probably orgasm.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Curse you photobucket for being down when I am most in need of my sith kittens.

[Winston Hughes]

It wasn't that bad..

For you, as scum, I'm sure it was quite hilarious.

For me, as a dead townie who knew how unlikely it was that Tak had put a cop in the game, it was a slow-motion car crash.

I find this to be a bit townie.

Oh dear god that's the last thing I need right now.

Being slightly town read for something completely irrelevant is only going to make me look scummier to everyone else.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'm still not parsing the comment. What thing was townie?

[Askthepizzaguy]

WH said:

After Tak's hydra game, I don't think I'll ever see another cop result claim without breaking into a cold sweat.

It wasn't that bad.. I find this to be a bit townie.

I asked for clarification as to what that meant.

I'm still not parsing the comment. What thing was townie?

Winston's comment that I responded too.

Seems like a pretty forced read.

I don't know how you read Winston's post there as anything but null. How would that be difficult or rare for a wolf to post? It wouldn't be.

In lieu of anything else to latch on to, Scarlett Aria made a read I considered forced. I guess if someone is a wolf and feels compelled to make a read to look townie, this can happen. Or SA can explain the process.

How? I just got out of two back to back scum games. I'm glad to not Rand it this game or I would run for the hills.

This doesn't explain the process and doesn't relate to the question.

Remember Wytch? Changing the subject indicates scummy to me. It can happen from a townie but I noted it in the thread.

Other people also noted it and backed it with a vote.

Nothing happens for a long while.

Votes accumulate on Cuth and Aria, Aria unvotes Cuth. Said "votes" when referring to her read on him, makes me feel like she's not even looking at him.

This is a low content round. And the votes were spread out a lot, making it a lot easier for a wolf to just lay a lazy vote.

Now that business is picking up, I want to know all about the processes that lead to this:

1) Why does you have a lean on Winston, Aria. Explain the thinking behind it.
2) Why does your recent scum rands have anything to do with my forced read comment
3) Why are you unvoting someone you were comfortable voting, and have as null, when you were also getting votes

[Askthepizzaguy]

If you're under suspicion and you're a townie, just explain your process better.

Show me how you went from A to B on people.

Tell me why people are townies or scums, just having a read doesn't tell me what you're doing.

[NotACop]

I'd be against lynching:
Scarlett Aria
Pizza
Zack

partly because they have seem OK so far, and partly because I'll be able to read them well later anyway(especially Scarlett and Zack).

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'd be against lynching:
Scarlett Aria
Pizza
Zack

partly because they have seem OK so far, and partly because I'll be able to read them well later anyway(especially Scarlett and Zack).

Walk me through what you see on Scarlett. Can you show me the process that looks townie?

[NotACop]

Walk me through what you see on Scarlett. Can you show me the process that looks townie?

Simply that the way she answers back on those suspecting her seems to be in line with how she usually does as town. Not a strong read at all, but better than the nothing I have on most others so far.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Simply that the way she answers back on those suspecting her seems to be in line with how she usually does as town. Not a strong read at all, but better than the nothing I have on most others so far.

I like how quickly you responded with a substantive answer. It also didn't look like it had an agenda, with too much attempt at persuasion.

Not that NAC was going to be lynched today, but I wouldn't consider it.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Heads up- I can probably give this game 1 more hour. Let's resolve where you need my vote by then.

I'm nodding off and that's a bad way to play.

[NotACop]

novice also seem like one who's fine not to consider for lynch today

[NotACop]

most people posting multiple posts seem fine so far, or at least not scummy.

so I'll
Vote: Riedquat
who only has a single, fairly anonymous post on page 1.

Cuth oddly silent - from what I've seen only a post saying the game started and then a sudden and unexplained vote on Zack. I'd say it is NAI so far, as I'm pretty confident he can do better than that in any alignment. + better chance I can town read him later, if he is town and he steps it up, which I can't with Riedquat.

[Askthepizzaguy]

In a game where there's been a lot of 1 or 2 posters, as a wolf, even I would lower my activity levels a lot.

Cuth can be doing that here. With votes picking up on Cuth I want to know why a vote is moving away from him.

[NotACop]

And I like Montmorency's tone at page 1, so not voting there either.

[Scarlett Aria]

WH said:


I asked for clarification as to what that meant.





I don't know how you read Winston's post there as anything but null. How would that be difficult or rare for a wolf to post? It wouldn't be.

In lieu of anything else to latch on to, Scarlett Aria made a read I considered forced. I guess if someone is a wolf and feels compelled to make a read to look townie, this can happen. Or SA can explain the process.



This doesn't explain the process and doesn't relate to the question.

Remember Wytch? Changing the subject indicates scummy to me. It can happen from a townie but I noted it in the thread.

Other people also noted it and backed it with a vote.

Nothing happens for a long while.

Votes accumulate on Cuth and Aria, Aria unvotes Cuth. Said "votes" when referring to her read on him, makes me feel like she's not even looking at him.

This is a low content round. And the votes were spread out a lot, making it a lot easier for a wolf to just lay a lazy vote.

Now that business is picking up, I want to know all about the processes that lead to this:

1) Why does you have a lean on Winston, Aria. Explain the thinking behind it.
2) Why does your recent scum rands have anything to do with my forced read comment
3) Why are you unvoting someone you were comfortable voting, and have as null, when you were also getting votes

Wytch is from my site, so yes I know her.

1. I don't see scum trying to post how much that makes the things in this one game makes them cringe. It just seems sort of silly for scum to do that from my perspective.

2. I hate randing scum and afterwords I feel like joking around before actually getting to the content because it's not about blending in anymore. Some people tend to just take that as being scum.

3. What makes you think I'm comfortable about a Cuth vote? I was joking with all votes until that unvote. It's because I remember Cuth is a bit more quiet here in the game before that I played here.

[Askthepizzaguy]

1. I don't see scum trying to post how much that makes the things in this one game makes them cringe. It just seems sort of silly for scum to do that from my perspective.

I find the contrary to be more true. It is easy to pad one's post count with things that are not scum hunting. I know I said this all game in my own defense in the previous game where I was scum, but this is true from my perspective and why I was able to get away with saying it as scum- but scum do want to avoid making too many enemies at once with their posts. I do it from time to time to challenge my own rule on what scum can or can't do easily, and for the entertainment value. But more often than not, they're avoiding making enemies. Generating fluffy posts that are just idle conversation is easy and, if the thread is already heading that way, the safest bet. Unless they're getting votes.

2. I hate randing scum and afterwords I feel like joking around before actually getting to the content because it's not about blending in anymore. Some people tend to just take that as being scum.

Ok.

I don't think your process in (1) is sound, and it bugs me that it took you so long to getting around to telling me about it.

3. What makes you think I'm comfortable about a Cuth vote? I was joking with all votes until that unvote. It's because I remember Cuth is a bit more quiet here in the game before that I played here.

My first instinct is to give Cuth more time simply because he can generate 100s of posts with which to analyze him.

What's making me question that idea is because the thread conditions were ripe for wolves to sneak under the very low bar town was setting for them.

On the one hand, you say it's a joke vote, and that it is null, but you also say: "I don't really like how his votes have been and I expected him to do a bit more but site difference could be the thing."

The process is missing a logical pattern I can follow.

I'm expecting a no reason / joke thing to be null, and I'm expecting reasons to find his behavior or his vote peculiar to not be paired with an unvote.

It seems backward. Do you get what I mean?