that's not what cass' reads list said
and if you're not basing it off of nightkills... then why would it matter how many people want to vote them? And in any case, only two people voted her and one died. How are you using that argument to defend Schema while accusing Fenn anyways?
It's such a weird way of going about it.
Yeah, and the underlined is not at all what I was saying. What I'm saying is that any thoughts you may or may not have had regarding Cass' choice about who she lynched are irrelevant because they are outside the readable content of the game. Al flipped town; who pushed his lynch? Sure wasn't me. In fact I voted Visor after he put a naked vote on Al, and I questioned Monstr about his vote. I could have come in advocating for a lynch on Fenn or Al if I was a wolf and I didn't do that.
Shouldn't I have been pushing the Al case forward?
So now Al's flip clears you?
I think you're doing this upside down. Unless you argue that nightkills determine suspects, you must use nightkills in the context of your existing suspicions. What I pointed out was that the nightkills do not - unless you have a new argument to present - say much in either way for Schema or for Visor/Winston. Cass and BSmith were obvious targets anyway, overdue in Cass' case. The only real mystery is Jabbz, and whether it could really have been a second Mafia vig or similar.
Now, as for the list I presented first in this chain, the one describing support for Schema lynch vs. support for Winston/Visor lynch, the list shows that support for Schema lynch is comparatively higher - this weakens the intrinsic case for her being scum, and weakens the case for her having to come in to save anyone at EOD. If she is scum, then she came in to spin for herself, not for any threatened partner.
And that is what Cass' read lists said. I have them noted down. Read them verbatim if you like.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
He could believe that, based on his reactions at my appearance. He didn't like my appearance at EOD and whatever he wants to make of that is up to him. That said, I showed up too late for any alternate target to gain much traction.
The reason I didn't pick one of the counter-candidates is because I did believe they were town. Why would I vote them, in that case?
I did the best I could with the little I had to go off of. Can't really say much more to it. Better to show up and take a shot at it imo.
Schemas shade of me at eod is priceless
'like my scum game'
That.you can neither name.or seriously point to as an actual reason for why I am mafia
Then again I also hated zacks post to schema defending me so ymmv
I couldn't care less that Al flipped town
Literally nothing to read him villagery off besides him posting a read list with near zero reasons once per phase
Name the game and explain it.
Because my reaction had nothing to do with apologising for Cuth flipping villager. (I thought he played poorly, mostly and his continual refusal to engage me for simple questions was lolworthy).
The only thing I mentioned is that I had a small sense of pride that I didn't vote him to be lynched because I had a small sliver of doubt, but I was mostly mad that I DIDN'T vote El Barto, who I did have as scum and my playstyle that lends itself to those actions.
I'm not apologising or whatever for reading Cuth wrongly, I am apologising for a prolonged flaw in my village gameplay.
(Posted with Pizza's permission, so don't get alarmed by a dead guy posting)
I'm hosting a minigame to try to revive CFC's Mafia Section. Sign up here if you're interested, especially if you're dead like me.
Does that have to do with me, or does it have to do with the other lynch candidates, or does it have to do with the people arguing for and managing the lynches? Of the three components, my own 'strategy' seems to have the least impact on who gets lynched. I have never made leading arguments towards any of the major cases of the past 4 days. The only lynch you can credit as even in accord with my current wishes might be the GH lynch. Otherwise, from my in-thread position every lynch has been suboptimal. And Cass, as we know, and as I pointed out common sense dictated, is town - so she wasn't in cahoots with me or any similar conspiracy. Indeed, my structural recommendations to Cass aside from the lynch were either ignored or specifically contradicted in her decisions almost all of the time.
So - who exactly have I been puppeting, or what? Who is operating under my influence? What terms have I set that we are now operating under? What have I done to accomplish which specific goals? Am I secretly a Serial Killer against everyone?
You seem to have a really bad habit of deciding someone is scum just because you don't understand their positions. After all, something about Visor-Zack-Monty should at least strike you as strange, but after all, these are the people who have most criticized your reactions in the thread, so of course that alone must condemn them.
You need to reinvent your analysis.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
10 alive..possibly 3 more scum.
BSmith was Night 3 vig - was he killed because he was clear or did they think he has more shots? I am leaning on the former. Generally people seemed to be accepting the claim and out of the 2 additional kills today, 1 might be scum 1-shot and it is easy for them to have figured BSmith was a similar 1-shot.
Jabbz was probably shot by night 4 vig. So that is one more townie we can clear.
Looks like i will have to go back and read the whole thread. Something i have never done before.
Can i do it? hmm..looks daunting.
DISTRICT ONE
Schema
Cuthillius
Renata
Choxorn
Dp101
Jabbz
dicetosser1
DISTRICT TWO
Winston Hughes
BSmith
Visor
Fenn
Riedquat
El Barto
Monstrbro
DISTRICT THREE
Montmorency
Al Sipsclar
Sooh
Cass_
GeneralHankerchief
Zack
atheotes
just for interests sake
I might go read over D1 and look at the progression of votes later and see how they went (from the unclears)
Vote: Visor
Visor, pick someone else for Chancellor.
Two 1-shot town vigs? I don't think that's plausible. And who could or would kill Jabbz? I can't really think of anyone?
Who would not be the killer, if town vig?
Monty
Atheotes (unless you're claiming?)
Zack - hasn't claimed, thought jabbz town or at least above null
Fenn - liked Jabbz
Dice - no claim, why not kill me?
Schema - no claim, I think liked jabbz - why not kill Visor?
Riedquat - liked jabbz, why not kill schema
Monstr - liked jabbz; if he's a role at all, he isn't claiming a killing role ATM
Visor - I think he liked jabbz, why not kill schema or dice?
Winston - I think liked jabbz, why not kill me or Zack?
Second big, let alone second vig killing jabbz, doesn't add up. We need another hypothesis.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Monty if you're a villager shut the hell up about me being a wolf and actually start doing something USEFUL
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Scratch that, three times.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Besides, both Cuth and Al Sips were playing poorly, to the point where a NUMBER of TOP TIER villagers pointed out the same thing
sooff
you're either a tunneling, annoying villager or you're a wolf and I don't care which, just get off my back for once in this frigging game.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks