PC Mode
Org Mobile Site
Forum > Forum Gaming > Gameroom >
Thread: Representative Democracy [Concluded]
Page 27 of 120 First ... 172324252627 282930313777 ... Last
Dp101 09:09 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
is this pm or am
It is glorious 24 hour time comrade.

Reply
Cuthillius 09:10 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Zack:
it's am
oh that's fun

oh well

ugh

Reply
Choxorn 09:21 12-19-2016
Oh shit I totally forgot the game had started

lolchox

I've been spending the past couple of hours reading through the thread trying to catch up. Don't have a lot of good reads on anyone yet, lots of people I'm totally unfamiliar with. Zack still looks good, I'll keep my chancellor vote on him. Slight town reads on Renata, Cuth, and GH. Speaking of which, Vote: Cuth for District One. El Barto and Monty are still impossible to read, and while I don't want that to be an excuse that lets them whomp us like they did last game, I also don't want to reflexively vote them just for last game either. Sooh I was going to vote before she claimed PR. I still don't like her, and I echo what Zack said about her here:

Originally Posted by Zack:
i instinctively hate generic pr claims like that especially combined with the passive-aggressive sentiment

but wolves are usually big cowards who claim vt
I also hate generic PR claims and don't see what the point is of soft-claiming and trying to string everyone along unless you have some kind of uber-secret mafia-killing thing of doom going on, and it would be an easy claim to lie about because you're not being specific, and I don't like how she's reacted to pressure, but I also don't think she's scum for it.

No real opinion yet on most people.

Last, but not least:

Originally Posted by Zack:
wow is float on the only modest mouse song that isn't actual garbage?


Reply
atheotes 09:36 12-19-2016
Sooh should not be lynched today.

I think Zack is going to vote Jabbz and i dont want GH to be the rep.
so, Vote: Cass
Vote: Winston



Reply
atheotes 09:46 12-19-2016
Tally # 4
Blue Green Red
DISTRICT ONE Rep Chancellor Lynch
Schema Cass
Cuthillius Cuth Zack Visor
Renata Dp101 Cass Jabbz
Choxorn Zack
Dp101 Cuth GH Sooh
Jabbz Dp101 Cass Zack
dicetosser1 Dice Cass Monty
DISTRICT TWO
Winston Hughes Visor Winston El barto
BSmith
Visor Visor Visor Sooh
Csargo Winston Monty Sooh
Riedquat Visor Visor Visor
El Barto El Barto El Barto Winston
Monstrbro Visor Visor Sooh
DISTRICT THREE
Montmorency GH Cass Visor
Al Sipsclar
Sooh Cass Sooh Zack
Cass_ Monty
GeneralHankerchief GH Zack Sooh
Zack Zack Zack Jabbz
atheotes Cass Winston El barto


Reply
Jabbz 09:51 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Zack:
i hate how you keep using these faux polite phrases when you're being condescending

"you're being an ass. cheers mate! good day pal!"

stop it

I also don't get what your problem is with me. You've had a weird obsession and you keep inventing new reasons to keep your vote on me instead of talking about actual meaningful candidates for the lynch. It's annoying and I think you're wolfy for it, but you just keep dismissing that and moving the goalposts to make some highhanded remark on what you perceive to my bad behavior.
It's not faux polite Zack, I'm a polite person as a general rule. I find life to be more enjoyable that way. Further, I would say that what you're viewing as condescension is being misread. Regardless, you might genuinely be missing my points as opposed to being a scum who found a target they find easy and is sticking to them, or just someone that tunnels on anyone that accuses them OMGUS style. So to try to rectify that potential situation, I'll break down my "problem" as you state it, with you.

It starts in #109 where I make the observation that I found your rapid votes to be fishy. Please note I also made the observation it could be due to your fellow players having a solid opinion of you, saying "That could simply be his personality, we have some very good townies on my board as well."

In #190 I conflate you and Dp101, though you don't really see where I'm confusing the two of you until #193. That's when I make claims about you that are actually arguments DP101 makes. You then, validly, question what the hell I was talking about, and then through out the "lolpressurevotes" comment.

In #197 I point out we use a different style, and try to not be a dick in response to your belittling statement. I again confuse you for Dp, going into detail about why that plan was bad. In the next post, #198, you note that you didn't say the things, and then instead of wondering how I made the mistake, you just say I'm full of it, which is surprising because you also read Dp's posts, and should have recognized the source, but whatever, that's fine.

Then, where it should have stopped, in #206, I acknowledge my mistake. I apologize to you for making unfounded arguments, and explain why I use pressure votes. Instead however in #216, you ignore my apology, and instead attack my logic as wolfy. At this point, the only reason my vote is on you is because I haven't gotten around to unvoting, and I'm not making further arguments against you, but you're being hyper defensive anyway.

In #228 I call you out on that, addressing your question about how many people were voting for you, and commenting that picking one part of my argument out and ignoring the rest as context is invalid. I also note a few posts down in response to Cass that my choice of Cass as chancellor wasn't in relation to you, but stood by itself based on their arguments.

There is a long lull, then you pick up on my post #390 where I explain how I feel day 1 is more for setting baselines. You say "isn't the best way to establish trends and analysis to treat it seriously and play it like any other day?" The next post you say you can't understand why people read me as town, followed by an argument saying it "seemed like artificial support from wolfbros." Two posts later you drop a vote on me with no further reasoning given.

I address that I feel I've been playing the day just like I would any other day in #404, responding directly to your comments in depth, and noting that your vote is sketchy. Rather than deal with it, you jump to a Tu quoque fallacy, saying that I can't call your argument about me bad because I said people early voting for you was potentially suspicious.

Then the real fun begins. In #406 you say "and if you actually read what i said instead of inserting your own interpretation as you seem wont to do, you'd realize that comment was an afterthought as a possible explanation for the number of inexplicable townreads on you" The problem is you gave zero other reason for putting a vote on me. Reading it as your justification, sandwiched between your vote and a comment on how day 1 should be played. Then you try to insult me with your "if you need me to explain..." comment.

I then drop some serious responses to your arguments, two nice pretty paragraphs worth. Your (non) response is to say you don't understand what I'm talking about and that my second paragraph is "rich". You don't respond to any of my arguments, you try to blow it off while attempting to insult me yet again.

In #413 you try to drive another shot at me with your "making up new reasons not to change his vote from me" comment, that ignores the arguments I gave that you evidently didn't feel were worth understanding or responding to.

That's pretty much our entire engagement prior to the 700's. I respond to your "second paragraph is rich" comment, to which your only response is to accuse me of not making reads, which I had been doing, and ignore you asking what my thoughts on the wagons were, which you asked after I said I was leaving, and responded to shortly after I posted when I returned.

Then In #749 I make my only statement that could be less than polite when I point out you're being an ass. A statement I will repeat here. You have, for whatever reason, decided you have a problem with me. I don't see you insulting anyone else, so I must be special in that department. I've been polite to you, as I am to everyone. I don't act condescendingly, I simply pointed out repeatedly that you were being non-responsive to my posts. You ask a question, I answer, and then you pretend I never said anything, or cherry pick out one or two things. Its either rude, wolfy, or both. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, and assuming its wolfy, because I don't know you and I can't imagine you have found a reason to dislike me already.

I'm done with this argument Zack. You have no valid reason to vote against me. You have no valid reason to be rude to me. Regardless I don't think either will change, but I've wasted enough energy on this. If you bring up new comments, like the observation about the voting with no reps having been selected yet, I'll be happy to engage with you on that, as for the rest, come up with a better reason to vote for me, or not, I don't much care at this point.

Cheers.

TLDR: Zack has no valid reasons for voting for me or being rude, he doesn't respond to my arguments, and that's wolfy as hell.

Reply
Jabbz 10:01 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Jabbz:
It may be my irritation with his style, but I also find Zack's support for Sooh to be off, even when faced with the line by line argument against Sooh that (I can't remember who it was, and it's late so I'm not going to look for it) made with their 5 post breakdown.

Originally Posted by Zack:
what?
I'm referencing this.

Originally Posted by Zack:
i hear ya it's a decent case

not sure if i will follow because of ego and competing for n1 kill etc
Originally Posted by Zack:
what?
You talk about not voting for them because of competing for n1 kill. You have a weak argument against me, and only one other person is currently voting for me out of 21. Hell, I'm not even 2nd behind Sooh, that would be Visor, then tied for third would be you, me, elbarto and monty. The idea that I'm competition for Sooh with their 5 votes seems unlikely. This is your only articulated reason for not voting for them, and it comes off as an attempt to avoid committing to whether someone is fishy or not, something scum buddies often like to do.

Reply
Jabbz 10:02 12-19-2016
And with that, I'm crashing. It's 1:02 ugh, so did not realize it was this late. Gnight all.

Reply
Zack 10:03 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by :
instead of wondering how I made the mistake, you just say I'm full of it, which is surprising because you also read Dp's posts, and should have recognized the source
is this a joke??

it's all just hogwash and i really don't even know to respond to it because it's just... ridiculous and rife with hypocrisy. The line I quoted above is particularly absurd and shows that you seem to have a lot of trouble even understanding how I might be thinking.

Reply
Zack 10:04 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Jabbz:
I'm referencing this.





You talk about not voting for them because of competing for n1 kill. You have a weak argument against me, and only one other person is currently voting for me out of 21. Hell, I'm not even 2nd behind Sooh, that would be Visor, then tied for third would be you, me, elbarto and monty. The idea that I'm competition for Sooh with their 5 votes seems unlikely. This is your only articulated reason for not voting for them, and it comes off as an attempt to avoid committing to whether someone is fishy or not, something scum buddies often like to do.
that line was obviously not serious

I also as a rule don't like to lynch claimed PRs on d1, how incredibly wolfy of me.

Reply
Zack 10:09 12-19-2016
also you don't understand how the lynch works, re-read the opening posts

iirc renata and i are both in contention for district rep (in different districts) and both voting you, so you are in fact a viable wagon

i also already explained the claimed PR thing with sooh, which you ignored

there's also plenty of time left for me to change my vote

this is what i have been talking about when i say you keep twisting my words and actions to justify a vote on me. How many times can it be an "accident"? You either ignore other things I have said, misattribute things others have said to me, or misrepresent it. And then you wonder why I'm annoyed with you or how I could possibly think you're being wolfy.

Like, HALF of your reason for voting me was for something dp101 said. When it was determined that I didn't say it, HE did, you completely dropped it. How come you didn't then think dp101 was suspicious? Because it's all just made up crap.

Reply
Zack 10:12 12-19-2016
i don't get the "easy target" thing either, winston (?) mentioned it too

you are not an easy target, half the game thinks you're town for some inexplicable reason

but whatever, there's a narrative to write

Reply
Choxorn 10:14 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by atheotes:
Tally # 4
Blue Green Red
Choxorn Zack
You missed my district vote for Cuth.

Originally Posted by Jabbz:
It's not faux polite Zack, I'm a polite person as a general rule. I find life to be more enjoyable that way. Further, I would say that what you're viewing as condescension is being misread. Regardless, you might genuinely be missing my points as opposed to being a scum who found a target they find easy and is sticking to them, or just someone that tunnels on anyone that accuses them OMGUS style. So to try to rectify that potential situation, I'll break down my "problem" as you state it, with you.

It starts in #109 where I make the observation that I found your rapid votes to be fishy. Please note I also made the observation it could be due to your fellow players having a solid opinion of you, saying "That could simply be his personality, we have some very good townies on my board as well."

In #190 I conflate you and Dp101, though you don't really see where I'm confusing the two of you until #193. That's when I make claims about you that are actually arguments DP101 makes. You then, validly, question what the hell I was talking about, and then through out the "lolpressurevotes" comment.

In #197 I point out we use a different style, and try to not be a dick in response to your belittling statement. I again confuse you for Dp, going into detail about why that plan was bad. In the next post, #198, you note that you didn't say the things, and then instead of wondering how I made the mistake, you just say I'm full of it, which is surprising because you also read Dp's posts, and should have recognized the source, but whatever, that's fine.

Then, where it should have stopped, in #206, I acknowledge my mistake. I apologize to you for making unfounded arguments, and explain why I use pressure votes. Instead however in #216, you ignore my apology, and instead attack my logic as wolfy. At this point, the only reason my vote is on you is because I haven't gotten around to unvoting, and I'm not making further arguments against you, but you're being hyper defensive anyway.

In #228 I call you out on that, addressing your question about how many people were voting for you, and commenting that picking one part of my argument out and ignoring the rest as context is invalid. I also note a few posts down in response to Cass that my choice of Cass as chancellor wasn't in relation to you, but stood by itself based on their arguments.

There is a long lull, then you pick up on my post #390 where I explain how I feel day 1 is more for setting baselines. You say "isn't the best way to establish trends and analysis to treat it seriously and play it like any other day?" The next post you say you can't understand why people read me as town, followed by an argument saying it "seemed like artificial support from wolfbros." Two posts later you drop a vote on me with no further reasoning given.

I address that I feel I've been playing the day just like I would any other day in #404, responding directly to your comments in depth, and noting that your vote is sketchy. Rather than deal with it, you jump to a Tu quoque fallacy, saying that I can't call your argument about me bad because I said people early voting for you was potentially suspicious.

Then the real fun begins. In #406 you say "and if you actually read what i said instead of inserting your own interpretation as you seem wont to do, you'd realize that comment was an afterthought as a possible explanation for the number of inexplicable townreads on you" The problem is you gave zero other reason for putting a vote on me. Reading it as your justification, sandwiched between your vote and a comment on how day 1 should be played. Then you try to insult me with your "if you need me to explain..." comment.

I then drop some serious responses to your arguments, two nice pretty paragraphs worth. Your (non) response is to say you don't understand what I'm talking about and that my second paragraph is "rich". You don't respond to any of my arguments, you try to blow it off while attempting to insult me yet again.

In #413 you try to drive another shot at me with your "making up new reasons not to change his vote from me" comment, that ignores the arguments I gave that you evidently didn't feel were worth understanding or responding to.

That's pretty much our entire engagement prior to the 700's. I respond to your "second paragraph is rich" comment, to which your only response is to accuse me of not making reads, which I had been doing, and ignore you asking what my thoughts on the wagons were, which you asked after I said I was leaving, and responded to shortly after I posted when I returned.

Then In #749 I make my only statement that could be less than polite when I point out you're being an ass. A statement I will repeat here. You have, for whatever reason, decided you have a problem with me. I don't see you insulting anyone else, so I must be special in that department. I've been polite to you, as I am to everyone. I don't act condescendingly, I simply pointed out repeatedly that you were being non-responsive to my posts. You ask a question, I answer, and then you pretend I never said anything, or cherry pick out one or two things. Its either rude, wolfy, or both. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, and assuming its wolfy, because I don't know you and I can't imagine you have found a reason to dislike me already.

I'm done with this argument Zack. You have no valid reason to vote against me. You have no valid reason to be rude to me. Regardless I don't think either will change, but I've wasted enough energy on this. If you bring up new comments, like the observation about the voting with no reps having been selected yet, I'll be happy to engage with you on that, as for the rest, come up with a better reason to vote for me, or not, I don't much care at this point.

Cheers.

TLDR: Zack has no valid reasons for voting for me or being rude, he doesn't respond to my arguments, and that's wolfy as hell.
And I thought Pizza's textwalls were bad...

Seriously, make your point more succinctly, or quote some of the posts you're referring to, or something, because this is more or less a bland wall of text, it's hard to see the evidence if you don't quote anything Zack has actually said, and I can't really parse a lot of it to make sense of what your argument is.

Reply
Visor 10:16 12-19-2016
cuth how do you sleep at night?

why on earth do you think I am scum, what in GODS NAME is wrong with my push on Sooh.

GO READ WHAT I QUOTED AND REFUTE ANY SINGLE PART OF IT.

I want you to TELL ME that the 25 posts of absolute NOTHING in relation to the game at hand is villagery. PLEASE. Tell me it is how a villager plays the game. From someone who is up to date and continually catches up and provides absolutely ZERO relevant thoughts on the game state at numerous times.

And you think I am a wolf pushing that for ????????????????????????????? reasons?

TELL ME HOW SHE IS A VILLAGER FROM THE POSTS SHE HAS MADE.

I didn't want to go all caps, but you seem to be interested in showcasing some serious performance art, so please, show me.

Reply
Visor 10:21 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
meh i disagree with the case on sooh

i think it's bad

i think she's always utr

and i think visor is making a subpar push on him

his play is very similar to the hydra game i think

didn't read the last three pages, but i did ctrl+f my name

and saw glimpses

monstr is trending up a little

i still trust zack over cass
Sooh is always UTR? WHAT. You do realise I am calling her out for saying LITERALLY NOTHING in 25 posts? Not NOT ENOUGH.

How is it SUB PAR

Did you read a THING I SAID?

in the hydra game I joked around the entire game because the rest of my team bar zack was COMPLETELY INACTIVE.

Reply
Zack 10:23 12-19-2016
DISTRICT ONE

Schema - bleh
Cuthillius - weird and bleh
Renata - fine
Choxorn - meh
Dp101 - meh
Jabbz - wolf
dicetosser1 - meh

DISTRICT TWO

Winston Hughes - meh
BSmith - has he made a post?
Visor - town
Csargo - has he made a post?
Riedquat - has he made a post?
El Barto - bleh
Monstrbro - town

DISTRICT THREE

Montmorency - meh
Al Sipsclar - has he made a post?
Sooh - claimed pr but otherwise bleh
Cass_ - town
GeneralHankerchief - meh
Zack - (mm)
atheotes - town

---

well that was kinda depressing

anyways good night, i'll be here before eod

Reply
Montmorency 10:24 12-19-2016
As scum, Zack vs. Jabbz brings would bring me great joy.

Je ne regrette pas de rire

But Visor ruins it. Maybe Sooh can vig him.

Originally Posted by :
Tell me it is how a villager plays the game.
Why should we believe that it isn't?

Reply
Zack 10:25 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Visor:
cuth how do you sleep at night?

why on earth do you think I am scum, what in GODS NAME is wrong with my push on Sooh.

GO READ WHAT I QUOTED AND REFUTE ANY SINGLE PART OF IT.

I want you to TELL ME that the 25 posts of absolute NOTHING in relation to the game at hand is villagery. PLEASE. Tell me it is how a villager plays the game. From someone who is up to date and continually catches up and provides absolutely ZERO relevant thoughts on the game state at numerous times.

And you think I am a wolf pushing that for ????????????????????????????? reasons?

TELL ME HOW SHE IS A VILLAGER FROM THE POSTS SHE HAS MADE.

I didn't want to go all caps, but you seem to be interested in showcasing some serious performance art, so please, show me.
Originally Posted by Visor:
Sooh is always UTR? WHAT. You do realise I am calling her out for saying LITERALLY NOTHING in 25 posts? Not NOT ENOUGH.

How is it SUB PAR

Did you read a THING I SAID?

in the hydra game I joked around the entire game because the rest of my team bar zack was COMPLETELY INACTIVE.
fake wolfy anger

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
Originally Posted by Visor:
cuth how do you sleep at night?
lol


Reply
Zack 10:26 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
As scum, Zack vs. Jabbz brings would bring me great joy.

Je ne regrette pas de rire

But Visor ruins it. Maybe Sooh can vig him.



Why should we believe that it isn't?
Sometimes I wonder if we are of the same species.

Reply
Montmorency 10:28 12-19-2016
Interspecies love is real, Futurazack.

Reply
Visor 10:31 12-19-2016
Zack, before I blow a gasket at cuth tunneling me d1 yet again

how likely do you think that this is a repeat of mountainous?

Reply
Visor 10:32 12-19-2016
also the discussion about who is being rude re zack and jabbz is stupid

just play the game

Reply
Zack 10:37 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Visor:
Zack, before I blow a gasket at cuth tunneling me d1 yet again

how likely do you think that this is a repeat of mountainous?
Reasonably? I dunno

I think he's being absurd which unfortunately is par for the course

But not really in the way that I think he acts as town? Idk, i can't even comprehend why he is pushing you.

I think he has decent wolf equity but so do a lot of people and he at least is someone that will get easier to read with time

It's super late and i made like fifteen typos trying to post this on my phone in bed

Reply
Zack 10:38 12-19-2016
Yikes that was stupid and went nowhere

Just ignored everything i said after"reasonably"

Reply
Visor 10:40 12-19-2016
alright cuth you have infuriated me enough that I went and quoted every single one of your posts regarding me from mountainous

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Zack:
visor hasn't posted 200 times so he's a wolf :fine:
i do kinda think his entry was weak
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
the amount of visorsheeping going on bothers me a little
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
i think visor might be scum
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
posting reminds me of the turbos where he slanked

also a "soulread" on scoobs who is sheeping his vote
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Cuthalion
Zack
Empoof

dyachei
Wytch
Sociopath
Scoobs
lulz

Phighter
NeedMoreManasi
Visorslash

MarkoRaj
Fable

@MarkoRaj something like that
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
i don't think the phi lynch is that justified

half of the people are sheeping visor and the other half are reading him for p much no reason beyond slanking
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
[V]Visorslash[/V]

still open to marko or fable lol
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Fable:
Originally Posted by dyachei:
[V]Visorslash[/V]
Read through visor's ISO and I'll pass thx.
why do you think he's town
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Wytch:
why the votes on visor?
i kinda think he's scum

similar to slankish turbos i've seen before

lacking a certain amount of fire

reminds me a bit of mike hunt lol
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Zack:
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Wytch:
why the votes on visor?
i kinda think he's scum

similar to slankish turbos i've seen before

lacking a certain amount of fire

reminds me a bit of mike hunt lol
he laid slank cover pre-game iirc
i know

that's why i'm saying

given that he seems more like slanking scum visor than town to me
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Fable:
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Fable:
Read through visor's ISO and I'll pass thx.
why do you think he's town
He's given his reasoning for his reads (Though I disagree with a number of them) and his tone seems villagery overall, I don't actually see any reason to wolf read him as of right now.
lol?

he's given reasoning for his reads?

he randomly voted at a bunch of different people and then said two wolves are in four people

he's talked a bit more since then, but i don't see how you reach that conclusion
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Zack:
not that giving reasons for his reads is a particular trait of villager Visor in any case
no but saying that's why you find him towny when he's done very little of it in this game is also not the best
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Visorslash:
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
fable

"he's talked a bit more since then, but i don't see how you reach that conclusion"

he gave one sparse read wall and elaborated on it once

this is after he's voted like 5 people without reasoning and been sheeped on several of them
I'll play how I want

Lolu
i'm not wolfreading you for not giving reads

it's how you play

i DO take issue with fable townreading you for giving reads


Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
i think visor might be scum
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
posting reminds me of the turbos where he slanked

also a "soulread" on scoobs who is sheeping his vote
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Zack:
Originally Posted by Cuthalion:
Originally Posted by Wytch:
why the votes on visor?
i kinda think he's scum

similar to slankish turbos i've seen before

lacking a certain amount of fire

reminds me a bit of mike hunt lol
he laid slank cover pre-game iirc
i know

that's why i'm saying

given that he seems more like slanking scum visor than town to me
i kinda think he's scum
similar to slankish turbos i've seen before
lacking a certain amount of fire
reminds me a bit of mike hunt lol


Reply
Visor 10:42 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
you're very mikey this game
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
meh i disagree with the case on sooh

i think it's bad

i think she's always utr

and i think visor is making a subpar push on him

his play is very similar to the hydra game i think

didn't read the last three pages, but i did ctrl+f my name

and saw glimpses

monstr is trending up a little

i still trust zack over cass
and i think visor is making a subpar push on him

his play is very similar to the hydra game i think

you're very mikey this game


time to die in a fire cuth

Vote: Cuthillius

Reply
Montmorency 10:45 12-19-2016
Visor, how the F did your quotes - what

wHAT?

Reply
Zack 10:47 12-19-2016
How have you been anything like mike in this game anyways

Reply
Visor 10:47 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
you're very mikey this game
the quotes from the mountainous games are from a game on MU where I was town and Cuth was scum and he shot me n1 because i pushed him and his wolf bro

Reply
Montmorency 10:48 12-19-2016
Originally Posted by :
Montmorency, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Originally Posted by :
No Thread specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator
And threads from 2005. What did you do, Visor?

Reply
Page 27 of 120 First ... 172324252627 282930313777 ... Last
Up
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO