Trump Thread

[Greyblades]

Not quite, the article neglects to include the context of the statement; specifically the question it answers:

Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week, that included information that “Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” These documents also allegedly say “there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so you know. But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious, and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Sessions can say that the context gave him the impression that they were asking specifically about information exchanges which he didnt consider the meetings with the ambassador as, without any record of the meetings noone can claim he was wrong to do so.

And everyone else...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...s-to-congress/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ress-congress/
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/28/516717...on-of-congress
http://www.politico.com/blogs/donald...ech-fact-check

These do not make the assertion of trump's speech being exclusively lies, as the independant does. Such a claim in a title that the content does not sustain is the hallmark of a fox news style propaganda outlet.

Edit it seems the independant changed the title since yesterday, I wonder why...