Trump Thread

[Strike For The South]

If textualism as such were possible, all Supreme Court cases would be decided unanimously or by a bureaucratic council of lawyers, without recourse to "reasonable" hypotheticals at any point in history.

And what judge doesn't revert to hypotheticals? Maybe Thomas? I suppose asking no questions because the text answers the arguements presented before you is a valid strategy. Most of these Judges merely side with capital against labor, in both social and economic cases. Although, considering who the founders were, they would probably be fine with that. But making that inference would be using my context, which is bad.

To be generous, by the same token given a modern context we could offer differing notions of what constitutes militia. For example, police, neighborhood watch, verifying general fitness to be National Guard (without joining), probably others. So there are certainly ways to weaken even a hybrid interpretation.

True. My whole thing is i want stricter gun controls and think the constitution allows for them. That's what I'm getting at as I wait for the optometrist.

In other news, Trump has finally broken the Catholic-Jewish stranglehold on the judiciary. For too long the voice of the white protestant man has gone unheard, this is our time!

[Seamus Fermanagh]

...In other news, Trump has finally broken the Catholic-Jewish stranglehold on the judiciary. For too long the voice of the white protestant man has gone unheard, this is our time!

But how can we expect a judge to judge righteously if they have NOT been raised in a tradition of guilt?