Trump Thread

**Strike For The South** · 02-09-2017, 19:37

http://www.businessinsider.com/kelly...s-stuff-2017-2

This is what's going to be his downfall. Can't separate himself from his money. Can't even be Clinton low key about it.

**Seamus Fermanagh** · 02-09-2017, 19:42

Originally Posted by Strike For The South

http://www.businessinsider.com/kelly...s-stuff-2017-2

This is what's going to be his downfall. Can't separate himself from his money. Can't even be Clinton low key about it.

You "dance with the one who brung you." It is his aura of money and "always finds a way to win" that is the source of his gravitas. If he downplays them, he downplays himself.

**Greyblades** · 02-10-2017, 07:32

I would laugh if this of all things is what gets the advisors everyone is worried about removed.

**Montmorency** · 02-10-2017, 08:31

Competent entries to the 'Me Too' series from Namibia and Morocco.

**Husar** · 02-10-2017, 19:32

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Competent entries to the 'Me Too' series from Namibia and Morocco.

The original page has been changed and now contains entries from all over the world, such as Australia, the two you mention and I think a few new European ones. On youtube one can also find videos from Iran and other countries not listed there (yet?).

In general Trump news, Gorsuch was apparently not amused by how Trump talks about the judiciary:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/cong...-trump-n718936

And senator Mitch McTurtle and friends tried to silence senator Warren when she wanted to read an old letter from MLK's wife about Jeff Sessions and his racist attempts to disparage blacks from voting back in the 80s:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/heres-the...131932007.html

As noted in the video, four male senators read the letter on the next day and were apparently not silenced.
There is also a 5 minute overview (and interview) from the liberalist propaganda machine:

The idea that one senator cannot point out the mistakes or unethical motives of another seems really stupid in this situation. After all they're supposed to vote on whether he is fit for a certain office. Possible that I don't entirely get what that rule says, but given that four senators could do the same thing one day later, the application is obviously very selective and politically motivated.

**Greyblades** · 02-10-2017, 21:15

I saw a theory stating that the Republicans are trying to encourage Warren as a "pied piper" candidate like trump was supposed to be for hillary. Seem to think she's the best candidate available for Trump to go against in 2020.

**Hooahguy** · 02-10-2017, 23:05

Well we have no idea who will rise to prominence among the Democrats for 2020. In 2004 did anyone think Obama would become the nominee? Warren might be popular now but will she be in 2020? I also cant see her in a position like that, she seems like she does best in the Senate.