I think you're confusing jumping with commenting and questioning.
Length of time matters IMO because a reaction within a discussion, particularly at this shallow stage of the game, indicates less thought being put into the vote and more of a reaction. Scum is more likely to think about what they do and less likely to simply react or switch.
Either way though I haven't decided about Renata (fairly torn actually), but your aggressiveness is concerning.
I would say that coming at me with ,pointely accusatory questions and not answering my questions or responding to my comments is decidedly aggressively defensive.
I confess that your following comment:
somewhat ameliorates my view on you, but you still haven't really responded to my original question.
I didn't know there was a lynchproof spell, it wasn't among my options.
I don't like this post at all, it sounds like what a scum would say if they wanted to defend a scumbuddy and go after the one attacking them. What do you mean, would have found something else by now? It's been a few pages, and it's still day 1, there's not much to go on.
Vote: Dp101
Well, only for one hand, he can still get more for his other hand, can't he (oh dear god, please no)
Well, first, like Lewwyn said, you could also be a scumbuddy defending a townie for buddying points and townpoints if Winston flips town. I also think you look scummier than Winston right now, and I think that you wolf/Winston town is more likely than you town/Winston wolf.
In any case, if you're both scum, why does it matter which one of you I decide to vote for? I need to lynch both of you, and he only had one vote on him and was getting lots more attention than you.
I agree you about disliking DP's vote. I also think though that it could also be as scum defending someone who is town and buddying up. It ties into DP's decision that Winston is obvtown, which again I don't think is obvious. In either case, I find his reactions to be suspicious too.
DP101
Bookmarks