Swords and Sorcery Mafia Without the Swords [Concluded]

[GeneralHankerchief]

I agree with all of that but a lock is a lock.

Tinfoil on the lot:

Monty: Al and Dp realise they had a rotten opening and decided to wagon a third scum d1 for maximum wifom payoff
Renata: Jabbz made one of the masons scum to balance out the flurry of abilities town has.
GH: Same as Renata but also able to counter a scan against him with godfather/busdriver/whatever
Winston: Godfather, either permanent or just ability used d1. Multicaster, might be shifty.
Zack: He decided to play a more risky scum game than normal and it pays of in tenfold
Choxorn: Al accidentally suicides from casting a dangerous spell or something leaving Chox able to claim a vig on him uncontested. Vigging Al n1 is oddly sharp play, even for Chox.


Knowing my spell inventory could easily make more more or less attractive as a target. F.ex. let's say I'm using bulletproof. Then I don't want the scum(s) to know.

That said, I'm not necessarily against more spell openness at this stage of the game. Town could gain more from it than that scum(s). Lemme think about it.


Depends, could easily prove tricky. Also, full disclosure, I don't want to die.


After picking for first two I each night I gain a seemingly random spell and a seemingly random mana boost. For most of the game I thought this was the same for everybody. Anybody have a similar set-up to mine?

Vote: Snerk

I understand that Sooh is the lynch today and I don't disagree with it. But I really don't like this post, it's getting way too tinfoily too early on and it could be Snerk laying early groundwork for otherwise-difficult mislynches further down the line instead of him.

[Montmorency]

Excellent. You and Renata take measures against Snerk, I will handle Csargo.

[Sooh]

Re Snerk: There's something about his claim that he was checking me N1 that doesn't add up. I don't think he was trying to check me at all. I think his action was entirely different from that.

[Snerk]

Re Snerk: There's something about his claim that he was checking me N1 that doesn't add up. I don't think he was trying to check me at all. I think his action was entirely different from that.

Oh I was checking you out alright! Well, trying to at least.

[Zack]

Re Snerk: There's something about his claim that he was checking me N1 that doesn't add up. I don't think he was trying to check me at all. I think his action was entirely different from that.

Have you clarified your n1 and n2 actions?

[Sooh]

Not N2.

N1, protect Renata
N2, vig Atheotes.

[Renata]

If you're still here, can you please offer your full argument on Snerk?

[Renata]

This is probably stupid but I'm tempted to believe Sooh right now. I hadn't thought about it this way before, but her killing atheotes is borderline suicidal if she's last scum standing -- she doesn't want to resolve that either/or situation.

Unless she really is suicidal due to hopelessness of course and this just ends it faster.

The one thing that makes me want to lynch Sooh almost regardless of her alignment is that if shes town the Sooh/Visor wagons all of a sudden become meaningful. Lynching someone else first leaves that day unresolved.

[Sooh]

If you're still here, can you please offer your full argument on Snerk?

Fine. I had a BPV from the start of the game. After N1 I was told it was shattered. Then Snerk comes and tells everyone his action on me failed.

[Snerk]

Vote: Snerk

I understand that Sooh is the lynch today and I don't disagree with it. But I really don't like this post, it's getting way too tinfoily too early on and it could be Snerk laying early groundwork for otherwise-difficult mislynches further down the line instead of him.

Well this is an interesting reaction. It's almost like I hit a nerve or something.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with riffing on tinfoilage at this stage of the game as long as votes and abilities are put to more down to earth usage.

If I'm scum then the game is lost, trying to set up mislynches of everybody with townsmear would be futile.