This game is going to be post heavy enough without a constant flow of meaningless posts. I vote Manasi with hopes of reducing that flow.
Oops, wrong format.
Vote: Manasi
vote: Jabbz
Color me surprised.
Monstrdude 07:17 10/03/17
I would say Csargo is a wolf but I can't tell if he just wants to look that way because technically this is a faction game
we'll see.gif
Originally Posted by Jabbz:
This game is going to be post heavy enough without a constant flow of meaningless posts. I vote Manasi with hopes of reducing that flow.
Honestly with how it's gone so far with a 48 HOUR DAY I highly doubt that.
Monstrdude 07:18 10/03/17
Originally Posted by Manasi:
See the problem is I can pepper the thread with reads and thoughts and shitposts but everyone seems to not be around or be disengaged to a level that I don't know if I can comprehend. I'd do something wild and exciting but there would need to be people around for that to be a real thing right.
rip dead get out of the thread Renata
I feel like this is probably villagery
now I have two villagers
#progress
Monstrdude 07:20 10/03/17
Originally Posted by Manasi:
Honestly with how it's gone so far with a 48 HOUR DAY I highly doubt that.
YA this game has had very little content with which I can produce meaningful reads
part of that is on me for not having been here and it's difficult to interpret the emotions in posts hours after they've been made
still tho, ya like maybe 5 alignment indicative posts I've seen
Monstrdude 07:22 10/03/17
It feels like everyone is just trying to keep their heads down as a result of not wanting their faction to lose
we all lose if the royalists win so idk
maybe tomorrow will be more productive as I predict a high % of death in the night
I OWN THIS PAGE REKT WOLVES.
nvm this one
Monstrdude 07:24 10/03/17
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
Tally accurate as of post 363.
Last one before I go to bed, try not to completely bury it in gifs.
BSmith: 3 | Fenn (131), Al Sipsclar (136), autolycus (287)
Manasi: 2 | NotACop (112), Arakhor (115)
Montmorency: 2 | Renata (271), Dp101 (272)
Csargo: 2 | Kagemusha (63), Choxorn (110)
Jabbz: 2 | Lewwyn (233), seireikhaan (289)
Dp101: 1 | Montmorency (248)
Al Sipsclar: 1 | BSmith (54)
Renata: 1 | Manasi (78)
atheotes: 1 | El Barto (146)
Sooh: 1 | Monstrdude (151)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 | atheotes (216)
Lewwyn: 1 | Zack (250)
Arakhor: 1 | ATPG (292)
El Barto: 1 | Snerk (301)
Abstained: 2 | Csargo (261), Logic (328)**
**technically invalid, but it's abstain so whatever.
Round ends:
A reminder that tie votes are broken by random draw.
If wolves don't feel inclined to post or attempt to make a case on someone, we're probably trying to lynch mostly villagers
Monstrdude 07:25 10/03/17
I'm gonna be asleep through EoD 90% chance
glgl while I'm gone
Originally Posted by Jabbz:
Color me surprised.
Make a vote on an actual read.
We've had this discussion Zack. I don't really find much of anything to operate on the first day. If I had something more concrete I would vote on it. In the meantime, Manasi is throwing out a whole host of meaningless posts that do nothing but pad his post count and muddy the waters. That's as good a reason as any other for day 1.
Originally Posted by Jabbz:
We've had this discussion Zack. I don't really find much of anything to operate on the first day. If I had something more concrete I would vote on it. In the meantime, Manasi is throwing out a whole host of meaningless posts that do nothing but pad his post count and muddy the waters. That's as good a reason as any other for day 1.
What's the point in padding a post count when the count itself is never utilized?
No it's not.
And you had no trouble making a case on d1 in the only other game I've played with you, so idk what you're talking about. It might have even been your first post.
It makes it look like you're active and contributing when you're not. As I said, it's as good a reason as any other.
And if you'll recall that was based on me conflating you and dp101, resulting in some really weird reads, and a lot of stress for both of us. Still, if I had something that substantial I would probably still pursue it, after I made sure I wasn't chasing smoke.
Montmorency 07:55 10/03/17
I don't get how Renata is so townie, and Pizza so scummy, but the following should raise your hackles:
Originally Posted by Dp101:
Brutal. So, when do people want to make cases?
So you spend the day fluffling, piggybacking Renata, and ask when the cases are coming? This can't be mere factionalism...
Originally Posted by Dp101:
On the other hand, I remember Zack being much more uptight as scum in my experience.
He was pretty uptight in Jabbz' game.
Originally Posted by Renata:
I'm still kinda depressed that Monty wimped out instead of getting his faction to beat me up, though.
They don't wanna. Looks like I'll need to forge my own faction.
Please sheep me. Country over party.
Originally Posted by Zack:
And you had no trouble making a case on d1 in the only other game I've played with you, so idk what you're talking about. It might have even been your first post.
Do you have a case that you could respect in other circumstances?
There is no case on Arakhor. If Pizza has done anything scummy, it's pushing Arakhor.
Monstrdude 08:19 10/03/17
defense of arakhor noted
MORNING TALLY, SLEEP IS FOR THE WEAK EDITION.
Accurate as of Post 412.
Manasi: 3 | NotACop (112), Arakhor (115), Jabbz (392)
BSmith: 3 | Fenn (131), Al Sipsclar (136), autolycus (287)
Jabbz: 3 | Lewwyn (233), seireikhaan (289), Zack (393)
Csargo: 2 | Kagemusha (63), Choxorn (310)
Arakhor: 2 | ATPG (292), Renata (373)
Montmorency: 1 | Dp101 (272)
Dp101: 1 | Montmorency (248)
Al Sipsclar: 1 | BSmith (54)
Renata: 1 | Manasi (78)
atheotes: 1 | El Barto (146)
Sooh: 1 | Monstrdude (151)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 | atheotes
El Barto: 1 | Snerk
Abstained: 1 | Logic (328)**
No Lynch: 1 | Csargo (388)
**technically invalid, but it's abstain so whatever.
Round ends:
A reminder that tie votes are broken by random draw.
Originally Posted by Csargo:
Okay. unvote, Vote:No Lynch
Montmorency 12:45 10/03/17
The only person not voting is Sooh. Took me a little while to piece it together.
Monstr, you seem.
Still most suspicious of DP101.
unvote; vote: Manasi . Nothing personal. I just don't want to die today.
4-3-3 Manasi-BSmith-Jabbz
Originally Posted by
BSmith:
unvote; vote: Manasi . Nothing personal. I just don't want to die today. 
But I don't want Manasi to die. Do you see my issue here.
Unvote; Vote: Manasi
I was abstaining prior, but after being told it only takes 30 minutes to read through all the random posts that Manasi has contributed, I feel like this is at least a constructive vote.
Montmorency 14:46 10/03/17
Renata, can't we compromise on the issue of you not dying?
Single Sign On provided by
vBSSO