It is arbitrary in how you're applying it. D1 it's a scumtell for how he avoided going further in on khaan, on d2 when he brings a whole load of unnecessary attention to himself for little gain, you brush it aside as irrelevant.
Make my case on what? I gave an example of where Barto as scum that refuted your assertion he loves to be in the middle of attention as a wolf. You ignored this and refuse to go deeper into it.
Do it again.
I want to hear you explain why 90% of the game is null because lolidk, but you decided GH was scum and to trap him based on that one post about khaan.
Not irrelevant. It was something that has a townish bent, what he did, based on his personal meta. In that light, it isn't so reckless for a scum. I'm saying that the Raith vote was neither clearing nor scummy, i.e. it does not detract from my case on the basis of D1.
As mentioned D2, in Visor's Small Game Pizza and Barto were scum with me, and Barto tried to complement Pizza in the center of attention. Also, the breadcrumbing lesson which GH find mildly interesting.
No, to both.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Are we just ignoring the fact that auto came in with that readlist with 2 scum leans and then voted BSmith? Is that not as weird as I think it is?
It's kind of weird, yeah, although he does sort of justify it:
Originally Posted by autolycus
Hmm, no one's really standing out but Champ, and he has enough votes for now. I know I'm at risk of tunnel vision on Monty if I'm not careful, so I'll vote: Bsmith for now. Be back on tomorrow morning.
I read it as him deferring his earnest vote until today. He doesn't have much time left though...
Originally Posted by Csargo
Why are we still discussing Monty's case on GH? It's bad, I thought that was already established. Discussing it further doesn't make it more or less bad. I don't know what to say at this point really.
It's not just about the case but about the tunnelling. And the fact that Monty is still tunnelling makes it interesting to determine how he entered the tunnel in the first place. To requote Zack:
Originally Posted by Zack
It also bothers me how you just call everyone neutral. Add on to that your barto and gh reads, and it feels like you don't really care that much about finding wolves. Your only scum leans are contrived for reasons I've pointed out (they did ONE THING you DID NOT LIKE so you won't let it go and you'll stay in that tunnel while they live), and you don't even bother to try giving a read on most of the game.
It's kind of weird, yeah, although he does sort of justify it:
I read it as him deferring his earnest vote until today. He doesn't have much time left though...
It's not just about the case but about the tunnelling. And the fact that Monty is still tunnelling makes it interesting to determine how he entered the tunnel in the first place. To requote Zack:
It's fine if you don't like or agree with it, as long as you understand me to my satisfaction.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
It's fine if you don't like or agree with it, as long as you understand me to my satisfaction.
I think we've explored what can be explored and I'm not exactly satisfied. Finding someone (could be a scum buddy, even) to tunnel for reasons that noone quite agrees with sounds like the standard game plan for scum!Monty. I think I'll keep my vote on you and hope to extract as much info as possible from this lynch.
It's kind of weird, yeah, although he does sort of justify it:
I read it as him deferring his earnest vote until today. He doesn't have much time left though...
It's not just about the case but about the tunnelling. And the fact that Monty is still tunnelling makes it interesting to determine how he entered the tunnel in the first place. To requote Zack:
So much tunneling in one day, I guess Zack has a point, but I dunno. Also, that's awful by auto imo. I like auto here for that alone.
Originally Posted by Sooh
I wonder if I can make Csargo cry harder by doing everyone but his ISO.
He did have that stupid fight with pizza when they were both scum in futurama though
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Originally Posted by TosaInu
At times I read back my own posts [...]. It's not always clear at first glance.
Not irrelevant. It was something that has a townish bent, what he did, based on his personal meta. In that light, it isn't so reckless for a scum. I'm saying that the Raith vote was neither clearing nor scummy, i.e. it does not detract from my case on the basis of D1.
As mentioned D2, in Visor's Small Game Pizza and Barto were scum with me, and Barto tried to complement Pizza in the center of attention. Also, the breadcrumbing lesson which GH find mildly interesting.
No, to both.
So you're willing to consider how personal meta can explain away possible townish actions, but not to look into whether his d1 is something he does as town? All of your GH points come across like you had this pre-determined position on him, and then fit everything to match that position.
what does "complement ... in the center of attention" mean? How does that connect to his willingness to hint at, then claim a poisoning which could have easily been pinned on the dead 1x poisoner? What breadcrumbing lesson?
So you're willing to consider how personal meta can explain away possible townish actions, but not to look into whether his d1 is something he does as town? All of your GH points come across like you had this pre-determined position on him, and then fit everything to match that position.
what does "complement ... in the center of attention" mean? How does that connect to his willingness to hint at, then claim a poisoning which could have easily been pinned on the dead 1x poisoner? What breadcrumbing lesson?
Why are you refusing?
So be a good sport and find something to make that case, instead of asking me to consider it as a hypothetical counter-argument?
In Visor's game, Pizza vigged - you, I think? - and breadcrumbed it to Renata as a town vig, explaining the reasoning to Barto in the QT. Here's what GH thought of it in this game.
Because I'm not interested in rereading the thread to ISO everyone for your pleasure, and then displeasure when I can't offer whatever you want of me. I've said all I can and want to for today.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
So be a good sport and find something to make that case, instead of asking me to consider it as a hypothetical counter-argument?
In Visor's game, Pizza vigged - you, I think? - and breadcrumbed it to Renata as a town vig, explaining the reasoning to Barto in the QT. Here's what GH thought of it in this game.
Because I'm not interested in rereading the thread to ISO everyone for your pleasure, and then displeasure when I can't offer whatever you want of me. I've said all I can and want to for today.
We're talking about barto, not Pizza.
So in your case on GH for failing to elaborate on khaan in a manner sufficiently pleasing to you, you are now failing to elaborate on GH in a manner sufficiently pleasing to me.
So in your case on GH for failing to elaborate on khaan in a manner sufficiently pleasing to you, you are now failing to elaborate on GH in a manner sufficiently pleasing to me.
Sounds like I can't help you. Take it up with management.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
So I've gone back and reread Monty. I'm not a fan of his inconsistencies, or his zeroing in on GHC when he is not here to defend himself. In addition to that I mislike the idea of lynching GHC when he has justifiable reasons for not engaging in substantial self defense. As I stated earlier, I'm down to rake him across the coals tomorrow, but doing so today seems to be less than ideal both because we increase our chance of lynching town, but also because we get less valid information to work with whether he pops town or scum.
Given the tie, and the fact that I know I am town: Vote: Montmorency.
So I've gone back and reread Monty. I'm not a fan of his inconsistencies, or his zeroing in on GHC when he is not here to defend himself. In addition to that I mislike the idea of lynching GHC when he has justifiable reasons for not engaging in substantial self defense. As I stated earlier, I'm down to rake him across the coals tomorrow, but doing so today seems to be less than ideal both because we increase our chance of lynching town, but also because we get less valid information to work with whether he pops town or scum.
Given the tie, and the fact that I know I am town: Vote: Montmorency.
So you're expecting the tunneling Monty to exit the tunnel for today only because of GHC's absence? Seems like an odd expectation, frankly.
And the tie is hardly a reason for voting Monty specifically?
SV has been entirely forgettable the last two days as well, after his D1 post bonanza.
as things should be, top poster is not my place
Convenient timing since I'm still not sure of much right now and willing to sheep you in bringing Autolycus to the table. Vote: Autolycus
Related, I'm wary of the first two wagons on the latest tally.
Convenient timing since I'm still not sure of much right now and willing to sheep you in bringing Autolycus to the table. Vote: Autolycus
Related, I'm wary of the first two wagons on the latest tally.
Re: Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [In Play]
Originally Posted by Zack
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks