Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [Concluded]

[autolycus]

Me, I'm a lurker, especially in the early game, but come out with analysis in the late game that gets stronger over time. Basically, I'm a geodude spamming rollout.

vote:Montmorency

[El Barto]

I've got nothing on Bart. Never do Day 1. Shoot in midgame if no wolves caught. Maybe shoot anyway. Bart's more a, he looks hairy if paired with other people. People I've a better read on. He's easier to theory around.

GH's rational is weak, but! I assumed this was novice's first game here. Apparently not. Would like a summary of previous game meta. Novice is so active this might actually help. I rate GH as a bit shady.

‘Theory’ is not a verb and ‘rational’ is not a noun, but that's Lisa's shtick. What is this ‘shoot in midgame if no wolves caught’ thing?

And if you think GH is shady then join me in voting him.

Yeah moving sucks, but I bought a house, my first, so it is well worth it!

How many tiles?

Me, I'm a lurker, especially in the early game, but come out with analysis in the late game that gets stronger over time. Basically, I'm a geodude spamming rollout.

What a convenient claim to the effect that ‘don't lynch me for a few days’.

[autolycus]

Barto, you've played enough with me to know it's the truth. My analyses aren't right, but I do tend to pick up the activity once we enter the mid-game.

[Jabbz]

How many tiles?

1920 tiles.

[El Barto]

I'll keep you posted.

Excellent.

1920 tiles.

Hexagonal or diamond-shaped? African or European?

[Jabbz]

African Triangles.

[Jabbz]

Caught up finally, but still don't have a whole lot of time. I can say from what I've seen that SeveringViper style bothers me. There is a high post volume and they do seem to be engaging, which hints town to me. At the same time, the arguments being made seem to be more shallow shots than meaningful. Basically makes it a crapshoot, but for day one you can't hope for much more than that in my opinion.

[SeveringViper]

I feel like half of the interactions people have been making with me/half the case on me has come down to pedantics, which is a dumb reason to lynch someone but then again I suppose I'm overdue to eat rope so que sera sera. Will try to put down some sick reads in the meantime.

Unvote Go on, this game needs some of that.

Scratch that, it looks like half the entire thread right now is built off pedantic arguments.

Hot take: Someone involved in the later argument (the whole Logic, Playground/Org thing) is scum, saw the earlier pedantic argument and decided it would be good to get in one of his/her own.

Those "pedantic arguments" were:
A. The few active players pursuing anything they could.
B. 99% me. What do you say?

Are you locking in the novice vote?

Caught up finally, but still don't have a whole lot of time. I can say from what I've seen that SeveringViper style bothers me. There is a high post volume and they do seem to be engaging, which hints town to me. At the same time, the arguments being made seem to be more shallow shots than meaningful. Basically makes it a crapshoot, but for day one you can't hope for much more than that in my opinion.

This...is disappointingly shallow itself. I think we've all well established that d1 is a c***shoot and there's little to work with, now do you have anything to add? What do you think of the others that talked?

[SeveringViper]

Correcting Unvote.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Those "pedantic arguments" were:
A. The few active players pursuing anything they could.
B. 99% me. What do you say?

Are you locking in the novice vote?

Not entirely you, but IIRC you are/were (please be "were") the only one who was part of both.

And nah, my novice vote's not locked in, round ends in 19 hours and I should be able to carve out enough time between now and then to get a more solid feel for things.

Sleep for now though.

[Jabbz]

[QUOTE=SeveringViper;2053748023
This...is disappointingly shallow itself. I think we've all well established that d1 is a c***shoot and there's little to work with, now do you have anything to add? What do you think of the others that talked?[/QUOTE]

This is not the response I expected, and I like it for that.

Response tone aside however, I don't see my analysis as shallow, but rather piecing together the limited information on someone who makes my spidey senses tingle. I admit out the gate it's a questionable conclusion, but trying to dismiss the entire set as shallow is kind of weak.

All told though, nice to see you've found your center here, I imagine you will find calm games more entertaining.

[Zack]

Caught up finally, but still don't have a whole lot of time. I can say from what I've seen that SeveringViper style bothers me. There is a high post volume and they do seem to be engaging, which hints town to me. At the same time, the arguments being made seem to be more shallow shots than meaningful. Basically makes it a crapshoot, but for day one you can't hope for much more than that in my opinion.

I don't disagree with this and wonder if Viper changes as I keep reading.

[Zack]

lmao censoring "crapshoot" just makes it look 100x dirtier, because crap isn't the four letter word starting with c that comes to mind