It isn't a slip though. Not a game relevant one anyway.
If he forgot that he played with someone recently or didn't, what does that have to do with anything in game? Or are you thinking that scum will pull a "I can't read this guy, because I haven't played with him before/recently"?
Nitpicking about game slips, sure, go ahead! I feel though that those are most often made by townies, because in my experience scums quality check their posts more.
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
I don't share no lawn, it's MY LAWN. YOU GIT YOUR OWN LAWN. And then we won't have no troubles, ya see?
On a more serious note, if you want to get into deep conversations and and analysis on day 1, that's... fine, but I'm not too horribly concerned about that yet tbh. Don't get me wrong I'll check back in on day 2+ and compare notes to days after, but I'm not too hot and bothered yet because it's pretty RNG on whether a mafia gets nailed unless they really mess up. Although, on the playstyle bit, I will note that the people from off-site have a bit of a different interpretation of town play on some level to what I grew up with. I'm a bit more used to *everyone* playing relatively close to the vest, yes, even as town. If someone's triggering your scumdar, maybe you poke around, maybe get them lynched off response, but I've never been a fan of these "here's my list, I think people's X, Y, and Z are innocent, people's A, B, and C are iffy, and people's 1, 2, and 3 are scummy".
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.
Alright then.
Hm, interesting~ ...And I really should get my profile picture a transparent background.
This is honestly an exaggeration, or have I been posting every 30 seconds? What if I hate that ridiculous pace and focus on talking for the sake of it myself?
The only reason it looks like people are doing that here is because only a few have decided that they don't need to wait a couple phases or so to start meaningful game talk. There is no set time to start getting serious or required rate of posts, and I would 100% say those things represent a stupid and poor mentality, but that works both ways. I want to be made to stop being easily one of the top three posters and not having there be a clear divide between them and the others by other players not waiting to an artificially set time to start getting serious. I don't like being the one who's commenting on everything and trying to start discussion about things that should be discussed. I don't think that's a ridiculous desire.
By saying "calm down and wait for d2!", you're telling me and the others who've been trying to spark activity and respond to things that those efforts and everything they've said means nothing. So you've already taken a position on things anyway.
That conversation's over anyway. Any other thoughts or reads?
My point was not to wait for "game-relevant slips".
That's not what he said and I never thought it was. N/A
That can be true, but how far does it go? If I say anyone who makes a contradictory/strange/suspicious post should be left alone because scum would be more careful about what they post, I'd get nowhere, accomplish nothing and lose. Better to take the risk and push anything, and leave it to the player to convince me they're town. There are times they will, there are times they'll fail and get mislynched, there are times they are scum who can be made to slip from the pressure. But holding back does nothing.
I agree.
d1 is the point of lowest info, and a correct lynch is often luck (and due to a lucky screwup). That's not my point and not why I want more people to get involved now. I want more people to get serious because there has been discussion already and there are things people can and should think about and comment on. I'm not too fussed about the lynch either, my vote is still on GH because I'm not completely satisfied with what he's said and done, but it's still a judgement based on a small amount of data that could well be wrong. But I have absolutely no regrets even if it is a mislynch, because d1 is a c***shoot, yet town should not sit on their rear and wait for some anticipated time of better info. There is what to discuss now, and it's because of novice taking the initiative and starting serious discussion right away d1 that GH has something that's making people vote him and there's been plenty of discussion to read and form thoughts on/from. Why wait?
Laptop has taken ill. Will be a bit harder to post outside home. PSA, as I hate my phone for this.
Elaborate on Csargo and Monty? Autolycus seems normal enough for day 1. No lean. Could maybe vote towards Chox.
More curious about the how of GH's reasoning than the game details. But thanks.
No one likes a pedent. Yes, pedEnt.
Haven't seen a post from Manasi I like. Not shady so much as empty filler. But said she's sick, so will wait to pass judgement.
Anyone have a vote count? Will manually do it in a few hours otherwise.
Just made one myself, pretty sure I got everything:
Novice - 3: GH, seireikhaan, Montmorency
Montmorency - 2: autolycus
Manasi - 2: Choxorn
GH - 3: SV, novice, Barto
Sooh - 1: Raith
Raith - 1: Logic
Seireikhaan - 1: Csargo
I don't think you unvoted before changing btw, @novice;, and that's a requirement for it to count.
Ok.
Of course, someone has to make sure there's something to check back in on from day 1 when day 3 comes around.
I'm not that bothered either with regards to who hangs, but I would like to get some information out of it. So let's chat.
Is your vote on me
A) A pressure vote
B) A random joke
C) A random crapshoot, where all things being equal, you might as well lynch a play style you're unfamiliar with
D) A serious vote based on scumtells hidden under your vest
If A or B, do you see it turning into C, or would you rather move the vote to another player? If D, could you open your vest?
Do you have opinions on any of the other kids on the lawn? Viper, Sooh, Raith and Cuthilius, for example?
There is nothing in particular to note, that was sort of the point. I usually end up having no lean on the majority of the players here at the Org, because I don't understand how people get leans from 3 posts with one sentence in each. All I'm saying is that those players seem like what I would expect from them here.
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.
By "my first thought" I meant it was my first thought. It was the first thing that jumped out at me when I was catching up with the first glut of posts in the thread.
You kept going back to it, but on second thought I guess that could just be a natural extension of people responding to you and you furthering the conversation, which is stupid now that I look back on it.
Generally when people/myself say "not aligned" that strictly refers to "they're not mafia together".
I feel like half of the interactions people have been making with me/half the case on me has come down to pedantics, which is a dumb reason to lynch someone but then again I suppose I'm overdue to eat rope so que sera sera. Will try to put down some sick reads in the meantime.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Scratch that, it looks like half the entire thread right now is built off pedantic arguments.
Hot take: Someone involved in the later argument (the whole Logic, Playground/Org thing) is scum, saw the earlier pedantic argument and decided it would be good to get in one of his/her own.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
khaan hasn't done a character schtick yet to start the game which is mildly concerning.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Csargo doesn't really have a traditional range as scum, a lot of it depends on the individual game factors and his own ability to invest a lot of RL time, etc. Follow him logically, look at his reads/see if they match up with the gamestate, try to construct worlds where he's scum and see if they make sense - all the usual mafia hunting techniques, do that more than look for individual quirks IMO.
I have a hard time reading Monty.
Why those two, OOC?
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.
And we don't get to know which Pokemanz we are, anyway, except that Askthepizzagary is probably laughing at us somewhere in a fjord.
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
g'night guys
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
African Triangles.
Caught up finally, but still don't have a whole lot of time. I can say from what I've seen that SeveringViper style bothers me. There is a high post volume and they do seem to be engaging, which hints town to me. At the same time, the arguments being made seem to be more shallow shots than meaningful. Basically makes it a crapshoot, but for day one you can't hope for much more than that in my opinion.
Unvote Go on, this game needs some of that.
Those "pedantic arguments" were:
A. The few active players pursuing anything they could.
B. 99% me. What do you say?
Are you locking in the novice vote?
This...is disappointingly shallow itself. I think we've all well established that d1 is a c***shoot and there's little to work with, now do you have anything to add? What do you think of the others that talked?
Bookmarks