Apologies for being AWOL. Typical weekend for me, unfortunately. I have read absolutely zero of the thread so far, so vote: Monty for purely random reasons. Will do my best to read and get caught up before end of day.
Originally Posted by BSmith
Third Party Neutral Survivor? If only he’d claimed right away we could have avoided this whole mess.
RANDBETWEEN(1,17) told me to?
vote: Monty because of the above this time. Extremely open to changing this though.
As for me, RL is even busier than normal and work (where I normally post from) is no exception these days. Don’t expect a lot from me. Policy lynch me if you must – I won’t fight it (much), but know that I am not lurker scum this game. I’ll do my best to keep up but I’ll likely be on the lower end of my activity spectrum this game. I won't directly claim, but will say it rhymes with Manila.
Originally Posted by BSmith
What is/was the effect of the poisoning?
Originally Posted by BSmith
Bit of an x-post there. If you don't get cured you die at EOD? Is that the net effect?
Originally Posted by BSmith
As scum I’d much rather eliminate someone that goes against my victory condition. I’d chose to leave alone someone who I didn’t need to kill to win.
Originally Posted by BSmith
I can only speak for my end of the deal, but I hadn’t even read the thread yet when I made that post. It was truly random using a list of the players in excel and using that formula to get to the row number of the player to vote for. Monty was the lucky winner.
Originally Posted by BSmith
Yes.
Yes.
No. It’s day one. The only person I care about not dying is me.
My name was on the list too, so I suppose I might have re-rolled if my number came up. But maybe not. Wouldn’t have re-rolled anyone else though.
Because I hadn’t read any of the thread, and excel was a way to make my choice truly random. I was hoping to get caught up before EOD and potentially change my vote, but I wasn’t able to make that happen.
Originally Posted by BSmith
Well, sure. But even if I didn’t know, I’d rather have killed/lynched a townie than a neutral third party.
Originally Posted by BSmith
I think we're mixed up. I am talking from a hypothetical scum perspective. Not a townie one. As a townie I'd rather leave a neutral survivor alone as well to focus on scumhunting.
Originally Posted by BSmith
unvote; vote: Barto I'm fine putting some pressure on here. Barto is damn near impossible to read, but the change in his tone this game, along with the seemingly odd choice of poisoning target earns my vote for now.
Originally Posted by BSmith
The noise to substance ratio is beginning to get out of whack...
Originally Posted by BSmith
vote: Champ. A fair amount of posts but I don't remember a damn one. Seems active but isn't really doing much.
I've just collected the posts, my only takeaway so far is that BSmith is unlikely to be paired with Monty, seeing how BSmith's random vote almost got Monty lynched.
Apart from that... His votes seem very "uncontroversial", which is a red flag in principle, but understandable for someone short on time.
Bookmarks