"Explosion" in Manchester

**Greyblades** · 05-25-2017, 04:42

Shut up.

**Pannonian** · 05-25-2017, 05:46

Is it normal practice in the US to publish evidence at this stage of the investigation?

**Fragony** · 05-25-2017, 06:54

Like usual, no lone wolf, several arrests of (alledgedly) involved

**a completely inoffensive name** · 05-25-2017, 06:55

Originally Posted by Greyblades

Shut up.

Are you saying you feel mad at how ignorant my statement was?

Originally Posted by Pannonian

Is it normal practice in the US to publish evidence at this stage of the investigation?

No, usually our media publishes evidence before the investigation.

**Pannonian** · 05-25-2017, 07:01

Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name

Are you saying you feel mad at how ignorant my statement was?

No, usually our media publishes evidence before the investigation.

On the first statement: how long did it take before posters started making jokes about the Boston bombing?

On the second statement: that's as glib as you get, given that evidence is by their nature revealed by investigation.

**a completely inoffensive name** · 05-25-2017, 07:14

Originally Posted by Pannonian

On the first statement: how long did it take before posters started making jokes about the Boston bombing?

On the second statement: that's as glib as you get, given that evidence is by their nature revealed by investigation.

A. My post wasn't a joke.
B. You don't get American media.

**Seamus Fermanagh** · 05-25-2017, 20:07

Originally Posted by Pannonian

Is it normal practice in the US to publish evidence at this stage of the investigation?

Officially no. We hew to the same standards as you lot, more or less. Unofficially, yep.

**Fragony** · 05-25-2017, 20:29

What journalist wouldn't use leaked information, almost everything was already known in the blogosphere, so much faster. The infrmation wasn't even all that interesting for anyone