I am not going to bother with most of the points, but I will address several, and then pull out of the thread. We will get nowhere with it anyway. The stats about Mexicans being criminals are subjective in the fact that you can find sources that back up your points, I can find sources to back up mine. I don't think Scalise's shooter thought he was acting against tyranny.

I can lecture on what the Second Amendment was for one simple reason. I am going with what the ones who wrote it said about it, the Founding Fathers. I figure they are the best ones to explain what it is about. The thread took this turn on a comment about that anyway. What Washington did after the Presidency is irrelevant anyway in regards to what the Second Amendment is about.

The right wing extremist bit is all hype. Violence by conservatives, even hard-core right-wingers, is extremely rare, practically non-existent, and those who do engage in it are very quickly decried by others. I can't say the same about the left, Obama and Clinton and Lynch and the leftists did virtually nothing when the police started getting shot, Marilyn Mosby said that the rioters in Baltimore should be allowed to riot, and all the destructive riots after any police shooting of a black man and after election day show that the hatred and violence in this country is concentrated in the left. Whether or not those police were guilty does not give people the right to riot and destroy property.