Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
Previous game on this site. Town pizza. Sooh was in it.

This is my 6th post of that game, extremely early in the round, in fact, so early that I got some guff for even having a reads list. I don't waste time getting down to business and trying to town-read people based off of anything they can give me as early as possible, mainly because the random vote stage and joke vote stage is utterly useless to an analyst.

Sooh: "Throughout the day he does a ton of analysis, which for the time of the game and the state of the game I'd say is redundant at that point."

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

reactions at the time, followed by my justification:








Note the bolded.

How I ended the day 1 of that game: By voting specifically to protect my town read. Which lynched a scum. Then I shot one that night. Why? Because I try to find as many townies as possible as early as possible so that these early rounds aren't all faffing and wasted time.
Sooh, my dear, you aren't right this game.
In FrenchRev you were much more measured and cautious D1.

As for the next post, in visorSmallGame, while you were an early sub and it wasn't D1, through the late game (d3-4) you worked very hard to find townies. You made similarly elaborate cases on why so and so is probs town due to voting and process, while other so and so are probs partners because whatever - please work with me you townies, I know you are town because bla, if you think I'm scum then lynch me and we lose. And then you flipped all the reads and rhetoric, with equal reasoning and rhetoric and conviction. It was all part of playing the field to create the situation that you want. You are kind of similar to that late-game pizza so far.

Just noting a few things that weaken the overall comparisons.

Won't read the rest of night posts till later.