XCOM Mafia [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

Why would Dp101 post that? His vote was the second out of 6.

His vote clinched the Jowy lynch on D1.
He voted for atpg against novice (second out of 6 at EoD)
He voted for BSmith against Manasi. BSmith has been scummy enough to be a quality counterwaggon.

Also, as I've pointed out previously, Manasi defended him from a practically absent Autolycus. Her posting has been sloppy all game (nothing personal, lass, I know you'll be reading this).

FfoS: Dp101

My scummafia trio: Manasi (dead) | Novice (to be lynched on D2) | Dp101 as third member.

Now I'm off to read some posts in the last 100 since I logged off last night and I came back in today after the lynch. Manasi reads different once she's confirmed mafia.

Jowy was a self-pres vote to be fair, and recall Pizza's comment on Manasi-Csargo crazy GOAT team for EOD1 DP votes.

I'm just not entirely sure what you're trying to argue tbh. Seems convoluted, and isn't very clear. Fredwood made a case that Cuth sheeped then I sheeped Cuth, but I should have sheeped Fredwood because he was the original, ergo I look bad because I sheeped Cuth. When the correct person I should have sheeped was Fredwood, but there's no evidence in the thread that Cuth sheeped Fredwood. Feels like you're just trying to build a narrative that makes me look bad for inane reasons.

Because it looks like distancing from Fred's case, when in some scenarios you and Fred could be scum partners.

[Csargo]

Jowy was a self-pres vote to be fair, and recall Pizza's comment on Manasi-Csargo crazy GOAT team for EOD1 DP votes.



Because it looks like distancing from Fred's case, when in some scenarios you and Fred could be scum partners.

How does it make sense for me to vote Dp101 D1 in that situation?

Why would I distance from Fred's case, but vote with him? When I could have voted novice or just left my vote on Sooh. Are you saying my scum team is novice and Fred? How does that make sense?