Quote Originally Posted by Csargo View Post
Mostly because it doesn't make sense. D2 he made an impassioned case against ATPG, citing his strong belief in novice's townieness as part of it. I don't think that's outside of his scum range from my experience with him. So the only saving grace would be novice flipping scum would clear him. There's a lot of stuff that just doesn't sit well with me. The fact that he apparently misread(?) the fact that his poison attempt could fail, after ATPG was lynched. His reaction after ATPG flipped. The fact that he poisoned novice, after having such a strong townread on him D2, and I don't recall him posting anything about that changing, I'd have to go back and look. There's a lot of things that seem odd with his actions this game.

I think he deserves more scrutiny if novice doesn't flip scum is all I'm saying.
I agree that some of these are weird, but is it really scummy? Sure, DP could be wrong or semi-wrong, Mafia could have access to poison solely or alongside the Town, and Cuth may have just been extra-very ballsy with claims (why claim Pizza poisoning in the first place if you knew it was false?), but right now I think even Serial Killer would be more likely for Cuth than being Mafia. In other words, this would be the case of 3 Mafia and 1 hostile 3P (with novice potentially being the extra neutral 3P).