Chess - Game Thread [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

People refuse to read him, because he's barto. But it's not that hard.

In the CFC/MTGS game on MU, I defended him for days before finally giving up. He was town.

I don't remember the game it was, but he was worried with fixing votecounts or something while having zero interest in the actual thread. I called him out on it as being wolfy, and got a mixture of scorn and ambivalence.

In Sooh's last game, I called him out as a probable wolf again. He was scum. I barely escaped getting mislynche d1, and got immediately killed by the town vigilante.

In Representative Democracy, as my teammate, I was literally begging him in our scum chat to please, post and do something. He did nothing but occasionally pop in to complain about the number of posts and do not really anything, pretty much what he's done here.

Look at XCOM. How much time does he spend complaining about having to read the thread? Does he make thoughtless OMGUS votes then peace out?

Nope.

Hmm, but you leave out FrenchRev, where (on the public end) he similarly lolcatted and complained. And I guess for a lot of people XCOM was a rather unique experience.

Here's some major excerpts from Barto's D2 in FrenchRev, where you voted him for similar reasons:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Non, Choxorn, mon cher, je n'ai rien plus que dir.

I disagree with this. The former part at least.

With this post I increase my total postcount by 50% (not even you can do that) so I'm giving you a lot of material to analyse.

vote: NotACop

Are you daring me?

You know, I always get lynched when I always OMGUS people. Lacking any better leads (I don't want a Csargowaggon for scum to hide when I haven't read most of his posts), vote: Dp101

I've decided not to say anything when I have nothing to say.

That is either a cunning Discworld reference or you've had some interesting experiences.

You… can try to provide something.

…

…

Can't you?

Your best rebuttal may be that his only D1 activity in FrenchRev was:

Due to pre-announced circumstances I have to be mostly away from this.

Random.org says vote: atheotes

while here he hasn't AFAIK announced RL limitations.