Chess - Game Thread [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

GH ISO PART II (2nd Half-day & EOD)

A.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

GH is getting more confrontational and voluminous in these stages, talking to more people. He confronts Pizza now, urging him to stop tunneling Logic and Csargo and townreading sheep; Logic is just like his Pokemon self. He agrees on Kage being townish, but "Kage is Kage, Logic is Logic, and one of them is definitely more naturally uncomfortable." Fredwood has a post contributing various reads, off-handedly mentioning that Reinoe's entrance was sloppy. GH picks up on this and asks about Reinoe, because he thought Renoe's entrance was fine.

Pizza resists GH on Logic, and GH agrees to check it out without changing his read in the meantime:

My context on Logic is way better than anyone else's.

Look for yourself. Pick a game, any game. Pizza's Logic=Townie challenge.

If you guys are just doing this to not be Pizza, that's not a good call or a good reason. But you do you.

If you ever get around to doing this, give me a real, honest assessment.

If you don't do a 180 I'm going to need a good explanation.

As opposed to a fake, scummy assessment?

Don't do it half assed or to confirm bias. Give it a real look where you can be wrong.

I don't mean to be insulting, but you're gonna go look to support your argument or refute me I think. Have an open mind.

GH agrees with Zack that consensus-wagon on D1 on a suspicious townie is unlikely to be productive, wants to diversify. Fredwood reiterates on why Reinoe's stance on Zack vis-a-vis Logic bothred him. Slaan asks whom GH is thinking about, and GH says some combination of Fred, Barto, and Reinoe, offering some commitment to be more active in the thread. Slaan asks why those three, and GH says "The three of them have actually posted and I don't really have a read on any of them.". Slaan is noncomittal. DP is OK with those candidates except Fred ("intermittent but genuine". Montmorency defends Fred to GH and asks for more on reinoe given that GH susses him but liked his entrance.

GH has looked at Barto and Fred, still has no idea on Barto, maybe lynch, it's a lazy read but GH doesn't care; Fred feels better, seems natural and focused, can be town for today. NOTE: GH supports himself with "I think it was dp(?) who said that while he was around he made some pretty good points, and here I agree pretty much", and this is something DP had just raised in a single sentence challenging his inclusion of Fred. This was just a ~20 posts and a couple hours back.

B.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

GH returns ~90 posts later with an ISO of Logic from Pokemon. Long post, but he concludes that Chess Logic is consistent with Pokemon Logic given the different circumstances of the early game in the two games, especially self-reinforcement of Pizza's pressure. Passive-aggressive comment to Pizza:

I don't think Pizza usually does it this early as mafia. Hopefully I'm just able to stop him from having it become one of Those Games this time and that's the end of that.

In fact, Pizza later complains that for all the insight GH missed Pizza's main point that Logic shouldn't be acting passive-aggressively, Logic should be more direct and forthright.

Right after the Logic defense, a Manasi vote:

In other news, I feel like poking the bear a bit.

Vote: Manasi

Zack asks how good GH is at reading Manasi, to which GH replies "reasonably well". Monty quibbles with GH about gamestates by noting that both Pokemon and Chess had 2 new players, with GH responding that Viper wasn't new. Monty asks why the Manasi vote, GH says to give it time. Winston likes Slaan's posts and general sense of towniness, to which GH adds that Slaan is a player who improves over the gamecourse and despite an early hiccup he unexpectedly doesn't want to lynch him. Winston feels "GH's big post looks townie in itself, but it feels a little scummy to me that he'd make that his main engagement with the thread at this stage."; GH explains he doesn't want to drown out the thread just for a low chance of being right. Winston thinks that's a weak post, clarifying so when Zack asks whom he refers to. GH asks Fredwood how often in his experience D1 consensus lynches have been correct, and asks why Fred is leaning Logic "unfortunately". Winston thinks Fred feels "real in the now", and GH asks how he feels about the "unfortunately" wording. Winston's response:

Contrived = scum?

Could be.

GH advances that Fred's wording if he doesn't care who is lynched between Barto and Logic doesn't make sense from town, and sounds like appeasement of Pizza; Fred finds this post manipulative. Fred explains "unfortunately" as feeling sorry/sympathetic for Logic, and defends the mehanics of consensus lynches to an extent. GH calls that lazy, because

you should vote for your biggest scumread regardless of context except for very specific exceptions.

This isn't one of them.

Fred is dismissive, and Winston doesn't like it at all:

Feels like Fredwood's playing 72/24, while GH is looking to eod.

Confrontation continues:

Winston: You might be right, I don't usually play 72/24, but can you explain how this is a Bad Thing?

Fred: My concern is still your wording, if you were fine with both wagons then I think you would have just left it at that.

Town play the day, scum play for the deadliine.

Vote: GH

Can you elaborate?

So now you're trying to direct what my response should have been? Saying that I have sympathy, something that I stated within the meat of the post, so it wasn't that much of an inference that the unfortunately meant that despite my humanity I'm likely to vote him. The wording is only misleading because you're actively altering the meaning.

Either way, I posted it because I felt like it and wanted people to know where I was at.

Couple that with your inference that I should not vote Logic because he's consensus and lolconensusisneverrightyouguyslol, then calling me lazy for not "voting" my top scumread (when Logic is a relatively top scum read)...tis strange.

Town's job is to use the time available to rebalance the information equation in its favour.

Scum's job is to ensure town guesses wrong at eod.

[To Xiahou] Zack is a bad vote.

Join me on GH.

For the town part you're generally correct, but I think you're oversimplifying the mafia's job. There's a lot more nuance to it, working on multiple levels to ensure both short and longterm success.

Luckily all I have to do is just say what's on my mind this game.

Show me the good stuff, GH.

Reinoe thinks out of all this Fred came out townie and GH awkward, but not sure if lynchable. Asks GH who his suspects are. Winston is prepared to place GH in his scumpile. Choxorn notes that townies control the day, so long days are good for information. Barto makes a rare post, and quoting GH on Reinoe he implies that Reinoe is bad because he voted Barto at some point.

C.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

In response to Reinoe, GH makes a long reads-post.

Zack
Kage
Monty

Dp101
reinoe
Slaan
Logic
Winston
ATPG

---town line---

Csargo
Xiahou
Cuth
Fredwood
El Barto

Choxorn
Manasi

Zack and Kage are high town, as well as 'Monty being Monty', but most leans are more-or-less null. Weird: Manasi is at the bottom of the pile, but GH doesn't mention her and proceeds to make a small case against Choxorn. Slaan asks why he has Logic so high up, compared to Xiahou, and asks GH/Pizza on their opinions of each other given they have opposite understandings of Logic's meta. GH responds that he still thinks Logic is consistent with meta, and the sample size is bigger than Xiahou's. GH repeats his notion that self-reinforcing pressure and Pizza tunneling on Logic have snowballed to the current situation.


GH is "bored" and votes Choxorn, making it third on the wagon after Zack placed the second vote. Kage asks why.

D.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Pizza makes his foreshadowed critique of GH's counter-case on Logic.

Thanks for looking at Logic, but I think you missed one of my biggest points and didn't look for it.

You saw his posts in another game as town, when he accused people, does he not consistently just say this post is scummy this person is a wolf I think this makes you more townie, his questions if any are more direct and mean what they appear to mean on the surface?

That's a highly highly consistent quality of his town game. He doesn't ask rhetorical questions or questions that undermine people in that manner, he doesn't do passive aggression. He's not highly aggressive but when he does it, it's pointed, and in fact, he does far more aggression (despite how mild it feels) in games than defending himself or anyone else.

And all of that solving is pointed and direct, not passive aggression.

I get how you're arriving at the conclusion that I'm just tunneling because I am, but if I'm tunneling on the right person and you're missing the biggest reason why it's right, I feel like we missed the chance for our minds to arrive at the same place.

I won't ask you to look again, but it was a massive part of what I wanted you to look for and I don't think you were looking for it. You found other stuff and I believe you're town, but I still think you missed the damning stark difference.

Kage suspects weirdness between GH and Winston, and asks about case on Choxorn, to which GH points to his previous post that Choxorn is not in line with meta. Notes that Winston probably town but no more extensive reads on him, doesn't respond to intimation of "weirdness" between the two.

With no context, GH says

Out of principle, I'm staying on Choxorn.

Read below for an account of the EOD CFD

EOD.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Zack begins CFD on Monty, calls thread boring for not following. DP feels CFDs don't help, and usually hurt town, and "interesting != winning".

GH emerges to call out DP given that he was once taken down as Mafia by a CFD. Votes DP.

Zack suddenly does not like DP, feels he gave him too much credit early. Calls GH "a gentleman and a scholar".

GH asks Zack to join him on CFD; DP should know the power of a successful CFD given that he suffered them as scum at least twice.

DP can't believe this. Pizza was right about Zack. Votes Zack. Zack calls it OMGUS.

Zack criticizes the Logic wagon as a waste of time or ~rand at best. If Logic is scum, he was bussed.

DP counters that successful CFDs shouldn't obscure the unsuccessful principle.

GH doesn't believe town DP would have had this thought given his personal track record.

Zack rejects DP's counter, if you only look at failures and ignore successes then you get a skewed impression. Votes DP.

Moving votes around at EOD puts wolves in awkward, uncomfortable spots and forces people to put their money where there mouth is. I don't understand the stance you're taking here.

GH urges, "VOTE DP DO IT".

Zack thinks DP is scum; EOD peels away masks and reveals true intentions. platitudinous? DP throws it back at Zack. Zack throws it back back.

Kage asks what a CFD is. Zack and GH explain the concept.

DP thinks CFD for its own sake is a bad idea and lynching through reasoning and process is a better strategy.

Slaan refuses CFD but thinks it looks bad for DP. Winston also rejects CFD (quoting GH's exhortation).

Zack says Monty and DP are better lynches than Logic, and DP's is distorting so NAGL.

DP calls GH desperate for begging for a DP lynch, can't consider either GH or Zack town anymore.

ROUND ENDS

THAT'S A LYNCH!

Pizza (1): Manasi

Zack (2): Xiahou, Dp101

Logic (6): Pizza, Slaan, Choxorn, Kagemusha, Winston Hughes, Csargo

Reinoe (1): Fredwood

Choxorn (3): Montmorency, Reinoe, Logic

Xiahou (1): El Barto

Dp101 (2): GH, Zack

Not voting (1): Cuthillius,

With 17 players there are 9 to hammer.


Standby for flip.

That's scum GH swooping in for opportunities, right? At EOD? And being opportunistic throughout the day? Like with Fred?

Vote: GH

Partner analysis with Zack is critical, but going just by proximity for now I'm oriented towards not partners. But then I would have to ISO Zack, and that's maybe too challenging for me. Nevertheless, my earlier gut read was suspicious of Zack, so if the two aren't partners past prima facie then something has to give.