Cuth you said you are more or less caught up.. what is your take on the situation?
If Barto gets to 4, please don't add additional votes to him, just say you want to vote him if so.
Use the time. If he's town, what in his posts say that he is?
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Vote: El Barto
I have no better ideas at this point.
Lol POE.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
I’ve been in a similar position to cuth recently, haven’t had much WIM in general with the game state being what it is. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a game use PoEs as aggressively as this one before, it’s kind of weird. I think overall though Slaan doesn’t need to be a suspect right now, he’s reacted authentically to the pressure. His currently proposed PoE is fine by me.
Check out this angle (general, not Barto). I'm planning to explore D1 overnight with this lens, and see if it leads to patterns that are actionable wrt living players.
So Zack reads Manasi horribly, wait till scums flip and do partner analysis; GH can read Manasi reasonably well, better than she might expect (votes Manasi). So that's a divergence.
Going by a quick advanced search of the thread I can't find a direct Manasi read in a comprehensive post by Zack, but at the end of D1 GH was scumreading Manasi, at points even his top scum. Still a divergence.
Here's what I have by the two on Barto so far (major items, not complete):
GH looking at people including Barto - BUT, this was before Zack made the case against him.
GH looks at Barto, but takes away a nullish, self-admittedly lazy read. Still before Zack's case.
Difference in games between XCOM and this one greater for Barto than for Logic.
Zack's case on Barto that he is trolling and lacks interest in the thread.
GH shading Fred, who suspects both Barto and Logic but thinks Logic should be the 'default' lynch for the day. (This could mean any number of things, but it should be included).
***
So I think Zack wants Barto dead, and GH doesn't really care, except maybe indirectly. It's still a divergence, but not as large as the one on Manasi. I have no idea what it means. What it means depends on Barto's flip now, and the nature of any other divergence I can pick up in D1.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Vote count:
El Barto (4): Montmorency, Pizza, Slaan, Choxorn,
Csargo (1): Xiahou,
Not voting (5): Fredwood, El Barto, Cuthillius, Dp101, Csargo
With 10 players there are 6 to hammer.
EOD4:
![]()
Vote: Csargo
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Vote count:
El Barto (3): Montmorency, Slaan, Choxorn,
Csargo (2): Xiahou, Pizza,
Not voting (5): Fredwood, El Barto, Cuthillius, Dp101, Csargo
With 10 players there are 6 to hammer.
EOD4:
![]()
I only got halfway through but I'd like to discuss it.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
I can see it both ways. There are a few good posts and odd interactions with the dead scums, but also scummy stuff.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Something that should be noted, how do you interpret that Csargo was posting right around when GH made Choxorn a 3-person wagon and he just ignores it, eventually voting Logic. And that's how he ends the day.
Ruthless power wolfing if that's how he treats the wagon to save his partner, and he doesn't have the pro-activeness afterwards to demonstrate a desire to win as a solo power wolf.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
If Slaan was confident that the Choxorn wagon could have beat the Logic wagon, then Csargo is singlehandedly what kept Logic solidly ahead when he could have tied the wagons.
Why didn't he tie the wagons?
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks