Check out this angle (general, not Barto). I'm planning to explore D1 overnight with this lens, and see if it leads to patterns that are actionable wrt living players.
So Zack reads Manasi horribly, wait till scums flip and do partner analysis; GH can read Manasi reasonably well, better than she might expect (votes Manasi). So that's a divergence.
Going by a quick advanced search of the thread I can't find a direct Manasi read in a comprehensive post by Zack, but at the end of D1 GH was scumreading Manasi, at points even his top scum. Still a divergence.
Here's what I have by the two on Barto so far (major items, not complete):
GH looking at people including Barto - BUT, this was before Zack made the case against him.
GH looks at Barto, but takes away a nullish, self-admittedly lazy read. Still before Zack's case.
Difference in games between XCOM and this one greater for Barto than for Logic.
Zack's case on Barto that he is trolling and lacks interest in the thread.
GH shading Fred, who suspects both Barto and Logic but thinks Logic should be the 'default' lynch for the day. (This could mean any number of things, but it should be included).
***
So I think Zack wants Barto dead, and GH doesn't really care, except maybe indirectly. It's still a divergence, but not as large as the one on Manasi. I have no idea what it means. What it means depends on Barto's flip now, and the nature of any other divergence I can pick up in D1.
Bookmarks