Maybe NAI, but looks like a good process.
Fredwood has his own reads and he's moving at his own pace. He's not on board with the Zack or Logic stuff but he actually encouraged someone to lynch both just now. The guy he's voting, in fact.
Zack's response to Fredwood's mention of his dropping activity / wim
See, Fredwood doesn't have to be lynching scums for posts like this to clear him.
This is bananas.
Essentially his one reason not to push on Logic. Seemed too easy, wagon was too popular. Fredwood was chasing his own leads.
It's bad for the health of the game and a LOT more valuable if the discussion continues.
Look at how much we found when we didn't just mega-wagon Logic. The dissent and continued drama and unsure outcome made all the other scums catchable.
Don't create enormouswagons, even on scum. It's bad for the game and bad for town. You can do better than lynch 1 scum. Lynch 1 scum and find their buddies.
Zack's response to Fredwood.
GH's response to Fredwood.
LOL
YES.
Pretty good post considering Zack's flip. Depth in this read.
This is hardly arguing against the Logic lynch, it's even supportive. This is a bad position to put yourself in if you're a wolf and are not okay with Logic being dead.
Where is the "let's lynch Barto today, for these reasons. Put him in contention with Logic". Etc.
Nonexistent. He's just solving on his own.
Trying to get support for some non-logic lynch. Fredwood isn't really on the fence, but he's not whole hog on Logic, so he should be "gettable" and persuadable to push elsewhere mebbe.
Sensing weak post, attackable at least?
Zack joins the attack as well.
Attackable.
Zack and GH both looking for attackable things at this stage of the game. They go for Monty, Fred, and dp at various times.
"attackable" meaning attackable townies.
We are done here.
Unfortunately.![]()
Bookmarks