Chess - Game Thread [Concluded]

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:45

Originally Posted by Dp101

I saw it as a joke, and nothing more. Don't think he was actually trying to undermine you.

DP-1 Kenobi, this time, we do it together.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:46

Slaancellor Paalpatine, Sith Lords are our speciality.

**Slaan** · 10-14-2017, 21:48

From the dark site turn you must

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:51

Originally Posted by Slaan

From the dark site turn you must

The dark side surrounds the Slaancellor. I sense a plot to destroy the Town circle.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:53

I'm not letting go of Master Xiahou. His fate will be the same as ours.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:55

Fred, I don't remember what you said about Slaan's reads vanishing. Are you sure they weren't just progression the opposite way?

Can you find that for me?

**Fredwood** · 10-14-2017, 21:58

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

Fred, I don't remember what you said about Slaan's reads vanishing. Are you sure they weren't just progression the opposite way?

Can you find that for me?

What do you mean? I confronted him about his inconsistency and his defense was him saying on Winston he was sheeping you and forgot, and with me he was misusing the term Lock clear, and with Monty...I don't really know what he's claimed, it felt like a non-answer.

The thing is I guess they all could possibly true together but just feels unlikely for a player of his ilk. So if there's a plausible scenario it comes down to tone under pressure, and aside from his post against you, his posts against me have felt relatively good. So I'm not sure what to do with it.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 22:01

Originally Posted by Fredwood

What do you mean? I confronted him about his inconsistency and his defense was him saying on Winston he was sheeping you and forgot, and with me he was misusing the term Lock clear, and with Monty...I don't really know what he's claimed, it felt like a non-answer.

The thing is I guess they all could possibly true together but just feels unlikely for a player of his ilk. So if there's a plausible scenario it comes down to tone under pressure, and aside from his post against you, his posts against me have felt relatively good. So I'm not sure what to do with it.

If it were me in his shoes, I'd be having the time of my life.

Don't assume too much about how he'd be feeling as scum. Everyone has been suggesting scums have to be hiding after the collapse, they gotta be like Cuth or Xia and just afraid to show their faces.

How does that win, if they weren't lock town before the collapse?

And if that assumption doesn't hold true for that specific player, then it's a bad read.

I'll go looking.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-14-2017, 21:58

The bulk of my case was based on the passive aggression post, bantering with the dead scums, and arguments against Zack being scum. Plus tinfoils about crumbs that didn't pan out.

I didn't think the reads progression was AI or I didn't take it into account, since he bussed a couple times.

**Fredwood** · 10-14-2017, 22:14

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

The bulk of my case was based on the passive aggression post, bantering with the dead scums, and arguments against Zack being scum. Plus tinfoils about crumbs that didn't pan out.

I didn't think the reads progression was AI or I didn't take it into account, since he bussed a couple times.

The only progression I have an issue with is Monty

With Winston, when he defended himself against you in his flowery post, he said as scum he wouldn't have killed Winston cus he had a null read on him, when he had Winston as top tier town N1. It gets into WiFOM because why does scum just forget things like that, but why would town basically fabricate a read that they forget later.

With me it just felt odd that he lock cleared me and then put me in his POE. I don't have an issue with anybody putting me in POE but if you lock clear me I need a reason for the retraction, and there was nothing between the lock clear and the retraction to indicate that he had reason to. His point is that he re-read the first 30 pages of the game and hadn't finished, but he had DP and Monty as lock, or near lock when any reason for locking either of them hadn't happened yet either.

Not even to rehash the spew inconsistencies.

The best way to get into my blindside is to respond to my good points like I would respond to good points, which he did for me with a multiple of my issues. So I have a flaw in my meta lol.