Biblical Creation vs Evolution- the age of the Earth

[Gilrandir]

I disagree that "religion" is not about proofs but faith.
I believe god wrote the bible [for other reasons such as creation] so when it talks of the son of god walking on water i accept its testimony.

So you have undeniable proofs that Bible was written by God? And that there is hell and paradise? And that first a man was created and then a woman (and not vice versa)? If so, out with them.

Do not think that we say that these things are only to be received by faith, but also that they are to be asserted by reason.

Reason tells me humans can't walk on water nor turn water into wine. So it is either one believes one's reason or has faith.

their are those who saw Jesus and what he did that say he did. You can reject their testimony as unreliable if you chose.

There are billions of people who see every day how the Sun moves about the Earth. Now does it?

There are people who saw David Copperfield walk through the Great Wall of China and Uri Geller bend spoons by looking at them. We might as well think that Jesus was an illusionist. That is if we believe those who saw his miracles (described ONLY in the book written by his father, as you claim).

I never said science was wrong. Science cannot be wrong.

...said inquisitors putting more brushwood under Giordano Bruno's feet.

I said evolutions assumptions and beliefs about the past can lead them to be millions of "years" [not really years is the whole point] wrong. For dozens of examples in peer reviewed evolutionist literature, see my op.

How about counting creationists' (= Bible) wrong datings? You still didn't answer my question: do you support the creation tenet that the Universe is younger that 10 000 years?

?Christians should not be scientist? all major branches of science were started by Christians.

Who then denied almost all creationist tenets. Like this geocentric world model approved by the church which severely punished the dissidents who denied it.