04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

[merl1n]

i liked insaner staking a LITERALLY 100% read strength on someone, bc i dont think a bad ever does that, but him walking it back some mitigates it a little

[Insaner]

i liked insaner staking a LITERALLY 100% read strength on someone, bc i dont think a bad ever does that, but him walking it back some mitigates it a little

Full disclosure, bud.

[merl1n]

trying to figure out what i think about general. i think i like him going against the grain with his read on me, but it's something i've done as a bad before, almost a refuge in audacity type calling someone out that every other player thinks is good

[Empoof]

Monty, shouldn't be considered a soft claim. I was saying that today (right now) would be more active.

GH, unrelated to whatever gut read you have I'm curious how you would describe my wolf play to someone who's never played for me (like, explaining it to merl1n).

[GeneralHankerchief]

Monty, shouldn't be considered a soft claim. I was saying that today (right now) would be more active.

GH, unrelated to whatever gut read you have I'm curious how you would describe my wolf play to someone who's never played for me (like, explaining it to merl1n).

Honestly, I'd probably describe it as Not Your Town Game and then go into the process of describing your town game.

[Empoof]

Honestly, I'd probably describe it as Not Your Town Game and then go into the process of describing your town game.

Do you think I was playing my town game in the DLP multiball game?

[GeneralHankerchief]

Do you think I was playing my town game in the DLP multiball game?

I wasn't in that game, so yes?

[Empoof]

I wasn't in that game, so yes?

I thought you were following along with whatever filler post you gave to voxx at I think EoD1.

I kinda think that read is a little archaic but idk how much you know about how shitty I can play

[Insaner]

Tally:
4 El Barto (Montmorency, Zack, Empoof, ladd)
3 Montmorency (El Barto, Pzelda, Cuthillius,)
3 Ladd (Fable, Logic, Egix)
1 Choxorn (Newyn)
2 PZelda (Insaner, GH)
1 Newyn (Choxorn)


Not voting: Merl1n, Dyachei, Csargo

This seems correct?

[Insaner]

Ladd wagon looks the purest to me

[merl1n]

does no one defending el barto or montmorency at all make them more likely good?

[Insaner]

does no one defending el barto or montmorency at all make them more likely good?

I was defending Barto all day. But I was the only one.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

You are correct here - when I was talking about Barto being spewed by wolfy people pushing him, ladd and GH are the people I had in mind. And also Cuth: who didn't actually Barto, but he didn't not push him either as he included him in his possible wolf list. But mainly I was talking about ladd and GH.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I saw someone point out that those 2 weren't even the main pushers on El Barto - he was mostly pushed by Zack and you also agreed with it, and I since the two of you are my top villager reads, someone, maybe even more than 1 person, had argued that my point about Barto being spewed is moot since the people I think are wolfy that scum read Barto have actually barely pushed him. But to me, ladd's and GH stances on Barto look exactly like how wolves treat consensus scum read villagers - call them wolfy and then sit back while another villager (Zack) does all the dirty work of convincing others to vote them.


Barto's big post and my comment on it:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I'm trying to think if I can give you something more other than it just seems natural to me. The answer is sadly no =/ It just strikes me as him giving his... unfiltered? impressions of things. He isn't trying to force any conclusions with his comments which makes it look genuine. He has very little volume and I know it's not a good town case but I think the reasons to wolfread him are way, way worse. It's literally just Zack's two post read where he said that El Barto was wolfy for not voting me along with his joke. That's literally it. It's an okay read to make 5 minutes into the game, but I just checked and Zack actually never updater his read, the only time he gave something else was this post:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Which is like, sure it's unproductive, but villagers cast votes on non contributors all the time as well. He never commented on Barto's read post.


Sorry it took so long, got distracted a couple of times.

[Empoof]

does no one defending el barto or montmorency at all make them more likely good?

Not in this player list.

Though I'd say a couple of us are defending monty, albeit softly

[Cuthillius]

vote: El Barto

[Cuthillius]

I do think Monty looks better, and I'm less comfortable with my company on that wagon

plus Barto is definitely pretty low-key

and I think it's a helpful lynch no matter what

[Empoof]

We might lynch pzelda here tbh

I don't believe 100%-never-rescind levels for insaner but he probably has some idea and it's like 70% likely

[merl1n]

We might lynch pzelda here tbh

I don't believe 100%-never-rescind levels for insaner but he probably has some idea and it's like 70% likely

my problem with that is i think insaner might be bad, so unless he's willing to stake a VERY strong claim on something that he can be held accountable for i'm reluctant to follow his lead

[merl1n]

how do role claims work here? if your going to be lynched are you allowed to claim your power? ive played in games where you can and in games where you cant

[Insaner]

how do role claims work here? if your going to be lynched are you allowed to claim your power? ive played in games where you can and in games where you cant

You can as long as you don't quote anything. But since this is a role madness game just claiming isn't going to be clearing.

[Newyn]

Vote: El Barto

Outside of Mont, the wagon's essentially my entire town list so I'm feeling good about this.

[Cuthillius]

yeah um

with all due respect I think your reads are rather strange, gh

[Empoof]

Vote: Choroxn

Thought I did that earlier but I think nl missed it, was probably at the bottom of a post