Quote Originally Posted by ladd View Post
merlin, can you explain what exactly felt artificial about insaner posts d1 and why did you say you liked him cliaming a 100% read on pzelda but made no effort trying to sort out pzelda and see if insaner may havehad apoint?
he just felt really artificial. he'd oscillate between kind of crazy aggression with seeming rlly overly reasonable/kind of slimy posts. kind of a caricature maybe? IME bads tend to be a lot more aggressive and try to get their way and he fit that archetype, especially when ppl were voting for ppl that felt like they just hadnt done anything to read into. i still dont understand y ppl picked el barto and pzelda over the like 6 other ppl who hadnt done anything, thats why i felt so hesitant/suspicious towards ppl pushing on the low content lynches. csargo got mentioned bsiclly 0 times on d1 for example. dyachei wasnt here and got barely talked about. logic had the post on u then disappeared. i did read pzelda and try to figure out what i thought, i made a post saying they cld die after doing so, maybe i should have been more clear? i just didnt feel like there was anything in there that made them good or bad and ppl having such sure reads felt rlly weird to me on d1. d1 is usually just killing someone who is suspicious and then real game starts on n1/d2. its unfortunate reality that i found most of the ppl pushing pzelda to be suspicious but theres a good chance they were all good. or mostly good. i have 1 person on that vote that im looking into atm. i liked insaner having that 100% confidence bc if he was a bad pushing a lynch on a good it makes him accountable for it and hed be under a lot of scrutiny, so i thought it made him more likely good. theres a small part of me that is kind of scared he had that 100% confidence because he knew pzelda was bad tho, bc i dont like any other reads hes pushing right now i dont think