Rampage Out of Space

[pzelda]

LA is a paragon, sorry I don't make the rules


fine


Why?


Not really?


this is bleh. Like, it feels like you're picking at the post for the reason that it happens to exist and that I gave the first read.


I feel mildly fine with him. Just vibes


I like Lewwyn for Lewwyn liking me for me liking Chessguy :p



Felt that I could get something in here but not really. I guess it's a good look that he's probably looking in the right spot for page 1, but as Pzelda says, not much to talk about yet. I guess I don't like that there's more scum potential than villa leans but w/e?


I think that Tims has only really made declarative statements?


Talk about these more pls


Bad

So here's my problem with Rask. It feels like he's mashing his mouthparts together and expecting something substantial to come out, but it's not. We've got his second sussing Csargo, that I was writing off as a joke until I saw this



literally everything Tims made at that point was declarative statements which didn't show any process, just an "ok I think that these three people are bad". He makes a "separate post" about Csargo which is all about him wanting to go full throttle for ??? reasons. I can write off the HK and Winston stuff as rask just doing whatever, but it feels like activity for activities sake

We also have this


This is just asking a question for it's own sake. Why would c4 change his read on me? I hadn't posted since

Ok, I need to see how this developed, but it's possible that Dolby tmi-ed Tim scum in his case on Rask.

[Csargo]

Ok, I need to see how this developed, but it's possible that Dolby tmi-ed Tim scum in his case on Rask.

Could you expand on what you mean here?

[El-ahrairah]

Could you expand on what you mean here?

Do you have any thoughts about my EZ TR of Tim yesterday?

[Csargo]

Do you have any thoughts about my EZ TR of Tim yesterday?

I know very little about you as a player, so not really. I remember you being good, so it doesn't tell me much.

[pzelda]

Could you expand on what you mean here?

I meant the way he attacked Rask for townreading Tim by pinning down very precisely the problematic nature of Tim's early posts. I don't think anyone else talked about them at that point. It could be a good eye, but in that case we should see more sussing of Tim in Dolby's iso later.

[Csargo]

I meant the way he attacked Rask for townreading Tim by pinning down very precisely the problematic nature of Tim's early posts. I don't think anyone else talked about them at that point. It could be a good eye, but in that case we should see more sussing of Tim in Dolby's iso later.

I think Dolby did sus Tim at EoD iirc. I don't think it was for Tim's early posts though, but for how Tim was going after Dolby at EoD. I need to go back and read EoD, but I'm pretty sure that was the case.