Who was l2s anyway?
By standard theory Visor and Renata look pretty odd for wagonomics, though I suppose it's NAI if it turns out Ender is town as well. Is there any sense at all that Renata was being coached in her approach?
I called out your brusque EOD comment that there are scum on the Logic wagon because, well, it would be very rare for there not to be with such a distribution. Generally I was struck by how you didn't advance the thread state with your EOD pop-in, so why do it that way at all? As either alignment it feels like you should be working some grand strategy, but the pop-in didn't feel like any meaningful strategy.
I'm sure you have good reasons, wrong or right, for suspecting all the same people I have been pinged by (I have no thoughts on Vulgard), but I figure I'll encounter them as I pore over your D1 contributions. Can you lay out in just a paragraph how all their activities fit against each other? What's the grand theory for the Mafia plan?
Since you're you, can you skim D1 of the last Org game (mini) and discern why Vulgard was the D1 ML? If he's your top suspect this will be relevant.
Because...
...
This was 150 MINUTES after game start. The only time I've had soul reads like that was on GH in Pizza's Nuzelock game, whereupon I fumbled my conditional vig in expectation that I could oust GH on D2 (and GH happened to be the one player vulnerable to my vig). Not only can Pizza crush reads the majority of games, he can deliver on them as well.
Tangentially, an honorable mention from shortly after the qy. Posts like this must be why I killed reinoe N3.
What I'm trying to say is, I recall asking you about your Logic case in comparison to his play in the then-previous game (XCOM), and you used that opportunity to deliver a slam-dunk meta case for why Logic couldn't be blue-aligned. My apologies if you did this already yesterday (wrt Vulg).
Bookmarks