Quote Originally Posted by Renata View Post
I gonna keep harping on this but I don't think that that kind of blatantly obvious hard defense of a town player who other people are reading as scum is about pocketing that player at all. It's about looking reasonable or correct or something when that player dies and flips town. If one of them flips mafia and you immediately start going after the other for this reason alone with no additional justification I'm probably not arguing too hard, because it could be correct (nobody else is actually bound by my beliefs about how they're going play), but I am side-eyeing the hell out of you if you're wrong. Ladd spew or no Ladd spew. Stop insisting on something being certain when it's not. From someone who likes to talk about "nuance" you have none here. Why?
I agree that that is a scum tactic, but I don't think Dya would use it here on Amy. Tho I think I saw her start walk back the shield a bit earlier today which works with the approach I am thinking of.

The only reason why I keep "insisting" on it, after my initial post where I laid out my thoughts, is because people keep asking me about it. I have not discredited any Amy solo or Dya solo case just because I cannot be sure. I am not trying to stop those reads. But I can still have that thought.

I have seen Dya play it like this and thats why I am not using much nuance on this matter. It has saved me from shame twice to trust their tone reads. I have also a memory of seeing them do this as scum towards a scum mate. But I havent seen them use their famous tone reads to clear a villa when they are scumming.

And it is fine that you would side-eye me. People usually side-eye me when I present the reads I feel sure of because I am acting so confident, then they misyeet me and in post game it is revealed that I was correct all along tbh. You going so hard against this makes me feel like I am correct on this one too and it makes me side-eye you tbh