reading pieces of the thread, and i find it sort of unbelievable that all three of cape, rask and vulgard fail to understand my rask read and make huge mental jumps with it, when it is short and should be easy to understand. Maybe I am more terrible at expressing myself than I thought. So just to not have to waste time with it and have it twisted for the umpteenth time, here is a short summary + restating my own acknowledgements
I had a suspicion on nutella
nutella suspected me
nutella walked back her suspicion
Rask immediately complained about that and shaded her for it
I have seen that as a common wolf tactic
having absolutely nothing else to go on, i voted there.
That was D1.
On D2, I said I needed to go through my read and update it
With this, I am announcing that I think the read is weak and could be wrong
However, Rask twisted it and misrepped my play so I did not feel complied to pull down the effort to do so.
I also found that twisting to be wolfy due to my thread position.
Here are some acknowledgements:
i know the rask read is weak
i am not hyper valuing it, i could very well be wrong, but my care levels are very low.
I have a few town reads but no real scum read
I will not force a scum read just for the sake of having a scum read when I have no clue
Especially in a game where my posts are under a magnifying glass and where people inject their own leaps of conclusions to them and act as if those assumptions are facts.
The next person who complains about me not having a scum read is the person I will unironically death tunnel until post game, both here and in the graveyard tbh
alrightie, lets catch some woofs!
Bookmarks