Org Mobile Site
Thread: This is Football! (Closed 10er)
Kills are getting weirder.
Taffy? Did you do that?
Taffy? Did you do that?
unlucky
Vote: Taffy
i'll re-eval at f4/3 if needed
i'll re-eval at f4/3 if needed
huh
well i guess i won't reevaluate cape rn then
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
Vote: Taffy
i'll re-eval at f4/3 if needed
this feels hurried.Vote: Taffy
i'll re-eval at f4/3 if needed
i guess i really haven't been paying attention to the nfl for a while now
brock purdy is like the most american name i can think of damn
brock purdy is like the most american name i can think of damn
I wolfread benneh for claiming my role.
Then I saw that wolves have fakeclaims and realized he just was lying as either alignment and I cannot really read into that.
Then I saw that wolves have fakeclaims and realized he just was lying as either alignment and I cannot really read into that.
Originally Posted by Jan:
this feels hurried.
its no one else unless it is and if it is i dont feel its necessary to sort that out todaythis feels hurried.
Originally Posted by Jan:
I wolfread benneh for claiming my role.
Then I saw that wolves have fakeclaims and realized he just was lying as either alignment and I cannot really read into that.
you're leo messi?I wolfread benneh for claiming my role.
Then I saw that wolves have fakeclaims and realized he just was lying as either alignment and I cannot really read into that.
big fan
oh right dak prescott
i claimed that because he sucks and was embarassed last night
i'm cj stroud irl
i claimed that because he sucks and was embarassed last night
i'm cj stroud irl
baud and taffy had a weird dynamic all game
i almost think it's too on the nose though?
like taffy coming in and dropping big cases and analysis and stuff at a point when people were kinda shruggy about baud later in day there and starting to turn on her
it's very level 0
that said i think there was a non-zero chance gemma wagon could have theoretically picked up some traction and if she was in that position maybe it's necessary to bolster yourself to have any shot of surviving
but shooting gemma seems a little wild after that
i almost think it's too on the nose though?
like taffy coming in and dropping big cases and analysis and stuff at a point when people were kinda shruggy about baud later in day there and starting to turn on her
it's very level 0
that said i think there was a non-zero chance gemma wagon could have theoretically picked up some traction and if she was in that position maybe it's necessary to bolster yourself to have any shot of surviving
but shooting gemma seems a little wild after that
we're all >>>>>>>rand v for being here at sod to see if we died or the game was over
the gemma shot is wild overall because I don't think anyone had locked her in as villa.
so for a lot of wolves gemma would be a got to yeet and not nightkill to win the game.
so for a lot of wolves gemma would be a got to yeet and not nightkill to win the game.
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
we're all >>>>>>>rand v for being here at sod to see if we died or the game was over
that is weirdly correct.we're all >>>>>>>rand v for being here at sod to see if we died or the game was over
i don't think it's visor
i don't think it's cape because of pre-existing reads and also i think of everyone left alive he's the one who'd be by far the least likely to kill gemma
i don't really think it's jan but it could be but he'd be playing with fire with his eod and general lack of teeth-sinking-in
benneh did push baud somewhat decently hard early d2 but that's the only big green check mark in my book
and then there's taffy
i don't think it's cape because of pre-existing reads and also i think of everyone left alive he's the one who'd be by far the least likely to kill gemma
i don't really think it's jan but it could be but he'd be playing with fire with his eod and general lack of teeth-sinking-in
benneh did push baud somewhat decently hard early d2 but that's the only big green check mark in my book
and then there's taffy
not to potentially chainsaw or anything but i'd guess its cape if it isn't taffy but i will admit i haven't done my reread
Host notes:
* I forgot Cape's vote on Baudib yesterday on some tallies. I have edited them so they should be correct. It doesn't change things mechanically. But apologies about it (I know it may have had an influence for some of you - depends on play style - but that's done anyway. I am reassuring myself thinking nobody spotted it, but Cape, 24 hours later lmao
)
* I have added links to the opening posts (flips).
* Check my ISO for tallies and bad jokes.
glgl
* I forgot Cape's vote on Baudib yesterday on some tallies. I have edited them so they should be correct. It doesn't change things mechanically. But apologies about it (I know it may have had an influence for some of you - depends on play style - but that's done anyway. I am reassuring myself thinking nobody spotted it, but Cape, 24 hours later lmao
) * I have added links to the opening posts (flips).
* Check my ISO for tallies and bad jokes.
glgl
Originally Posted by Gemma:
Vote: Taffy
taffy joyless
looking at sod2.Vote: Taffy
taffy joyless
that was gemmas entry post.
I wanted to look more into how the baudib pressure build d2 but this jumped at me first.
Originally Posted by Raskolnikov:
Host notes:
* I forgot Cape's vote on Baudib yesterday on some tallies. I have edited them so they should be correct. It doesn't change things mechanically. But apologies about it (I know it may have had an influence for some of you - depends on play style - but that's done anyway. I am reassuring myself thinking nobody spotted it, but Cape, 24 hours later lmao )
* I have added links to the opening posts (flips).
* Check my ISO for tallies and bad jokes.
glgl
oh shit i would have played completely differently all day yesterday if i'd knownHost notes:
* I forgot Cape's vote on Baudib yesterday on some tallies. I have edited them so they should be correct. It doesn't change things mechanically. But apologies about it (I know it may have had an influence for some of you - depends on play style - but that's done anyway. I am reassuring myself thinking nobody spotted it, but Cape, 24 hours later lmao
) * I have added links to the opening posts (flips).
* Check my ISO for tallies and bad jokes.
glgl
i appreciate the jokes btw!
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
i don't think it's visor
i don't think it's cape because of pre-existing reads and also i think of everyone left alive he's the one who'd be by far the least likely to kill gemma
i don't really think it's jan but it could be but he'd be playing with fire with his eod and general lack of teeth-sinking-in
benneh did push baud somewhat decently hard early d2 but that's the only big green check mark in my book
and then there's taffy
i just voted him and afk'd all day basically, i wouldnt say i 'pushed him hard'i don't think it's visor
i don't think it's cape because of pre-existing reads and also i think of everyone left alive he's the one who'd be by far the least likely to kill gemma
i don't really think it's jan but it could be but he'd be playing with fire with his eod and general lack of teeth-sinking-in
benneh did push baud somewhat decently hard early d2 but that's the only big green check mark in my book
and then there's taffy
but i feel like you should see how that clears me because you know that i would be working my butt off to kill anyone else besides baud or at least be getting more meaningful antispew to distance us
i will also note visor/baud and i think even jan were open to voting you and i could have swapped to make you the lead at some point and the only thing i did was Unvote to let it rand between me and baud and never entertained voting you even if i couldnt quite clear you
baud wanted me to die
i'm a pr
do i need to go on
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
not to potentially chainsaw or anything but i'd guess its cape if it isn't taffy but i will admit i haven't done my reread
why would cape kill gemmanot to potentially chainsaw or anything but i'd guess its cape if it isn't taffy but i will admit i haven't done my reread
apart from to make me make this argument
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
i just voted him and afk'd all day basically, i wouldnt say i 'pushed him hard'
but i feel like you should see how that clears me because you know that i would be working my butt off to kill anyone else besides baud or at least be getting more meaningful antispew to distance us
i will also note visor/baud and i think even jan were open to voting you and i could have swapped to make you the lead at some point and the only thing i did was Unvote to let it rand between me and baud and never entertained voting you even if i couldnt quite clear you
baud wanted me to die
i'm a pr
do i need to go on
sicki just voted him and afk'd all day basically, i wouldnt say i 'pushed him hard'
but i feel like you should see how that clears me because you know that i would be working my butt off to kill anyone else besides baud or at least be getting more meaningful antispew to distance us
i will also note visor/baud and i think even jan were open to voting you and i could have swapped to make you the lead at some point and the only thing i did was Unvote to let it rand between me and baud and never entertained voting you even if i couldnt quite clear you
baud wanted me to die
i'm a pr
do i need to go on
gemma v n1 yeah?
And I was really confused a moment ago when I was sure my vote on cuth at the time was a fun tiebreaker.
my play now looks even more like the village idiot!
my play now looks even more like the village idiot!
Originally Posted by Cuthillius:
why would cape kill gemma
apart from to make me make this argument
gemma was very clear, why notwhy would cape kill gemma
apart from to make me make this argument
to frame taffy maybe
if you think there are arguments for more obvious kills than gemma (e.g. visor or jan or ... me!) then you could probly assign them some wolf equity based off of that but i think gemma was a decent kill for almost any team? she wans't getting mislunched at any point after bauds death idt
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
gemma was very clear, why not
to frame taffy maybe
if you think there are arguments for more obvious kills than gemma (e.g. visor or jan or ... me!) then you could probly assign them some wolf equity based off of that but i think gemma was a decent kill for almost any team? she wans't getting mislunched at any point after bauds death idt
hm fair maybe i'm underestimating capegemma was very clear, why not
to frame taffy maybe
if you think there are arguments for more obvious kills than gemma (e.g. visor or jan or ... me!) then you could probly assign them some wolf equity based off of that but i think gemma was a decent kill for almost any team? she wans't getting mislunched at any point after bauds death idt
will take into consideration
Originally Posted by Gemma:
taffy and baudib are either best friends irl or masons which i don't think ever exists in a 10p game or wolfbuds or i just flat out don't understand the way they've interacted this game
...taffy and baudib are either best friends irl or masons which i don't think ever exists in a 10p game or wolfbuds or i just flat out don't understand the way they've interacted this game
i'm primarily clearing visor because i'm relating his play to my own in that i don't think he would just shrugyeet baud day 2 (and also push d1!) without really doing much else to secure his status itt
like caveat that i know visor is in his post-tryhard days of werewolf but i still don't think he just does ?this
like caveat that i know visor is in his post-tryhard days of werewolf but i still don't think he just does ?this
Originally Posted by nebjiamn:
i'm primarily clearing visor because i'm relating his play to my own in that i don't think he would just shrugyeet baud day 2 (and also push d1!) without really doing much else to secure his status itt
like caveat that i know visor is in his post-tryhard days of werewolf but i still don't think he just does ?this
yei'm primarily clearing visor because i'm relating his play to my own in that i don't think he would just shrugyeet baud day 2 (and also push d1!) without really doing much else to secure his status itt
like caveat that i know visor is in his post-tryhard days of werewolf but i still don't think he just does ?this
i think the d1 stuff is by far the best look i think w/ him and dya both pushing there it had a legit chance of going over
i defs considered swapping at one point
i was assuming visor was pr also because of this
Originally Posted by Gemma:
?????? yo tell me someone can think someone is lean v and also just made nai posts at the same time like this
it's like they're trying to suggest jan has tmi but skipping all the steps needed to actually get to a real read of someone having tmi, like that person providing over the top reasoning... not like that person v reading someone you also v read on page 0
"this person wolfy because they have similar read to me" with no further elaboration is just wild
you might as well wolfread yourself while you're at it
the rest of these are nonreads imo like they don't feel like natural thoughts its tonally wolfy also this is what actually wolfy going through the motions or whatever it was you said cape was early day 1 looks like imo
also the pzelda read is something
this was pzelda's post:
pzelda wolfy because they said they're not in the mood for reading but played the game anyway is the most ungenerous take i think you could possibly make from that
taffys been v reading baudib all game
her baudib read is levels of wonky to me
its out of proportion to what baudib has actually done in a way that i think feels forced
for the amount of effort she's put into her baudib v read (not just in this post) it's wishy washy slash noncommittal, and immediately after trying to convince herself/others baudib is town she moves to considering baudib partners namely visor (also despite not w reading visor) - and shortly afterwards asks visor to sell her on w!baudib. separately these are things that are whatever but together with each other they feel incoherent and dissonant imo
i don't think it fits the bill of a villager with a real read that they're torn about
it looks even worse if baudib flips w (and i currently think he will)
the rest of her posts would just be quoting them saying wolfy tone
/39
this was an awesome gemma post -- click thru imo and read their points?????? yo tell me someone can think someone is lean v and also just made nai posts at the same time like this
it's like they're trying to suggest jan has tmi but skipping all the steps needed to actually get to a real read of someone having tmi, like that person providing over the top reasoning... not like that person v reading someone you also v read on page 0
"this person wolfy because they have similar read to me" with no further elaboration is just wild
you might as well wolfread yourself while you're at it
the rest of these are nonreads imo like they don't feel like natural thoughts its tonally wolfy also this is what actually wolfy going through the motions or whatever it was you said cape was early day 1 looks like imo
also the pzelda read is something
this was pzelda's post:
pzelda wolfy because they said they're not in the mood for reading but played the game anyway is the most ungenerous take i think you could possibly make from that
taffys been v reading baudib all game
her baudib read is levels of wonky to me
its out of proportion to what baudib has actually done in a way that i think feels forced
for the amount of effort she's put into her baudib v read (not just in this post) it's wishy washy slash noncommittal, and immediately after trying to convince herself/others baudib is town she moves to considering baudib partners namely visor (also despite not w reading visor) - and shortly afterwards asks visor to sell her on w!baudib. separately these are things that are whatever but together with each other they feel incoherent and dissonant imo
i don't think it fits the bill of a villager with a real read that they're torn about
it looks even worse if baudib flips w (and i currently think he will)
the rest of her posts would just be quoting them saying wolfy tone
/39
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO