Ladd i have villa, just out of his D1 solving. The read is kinda idle rn considering their irl.
Now I smh didnt like his first page posts but I am not sure if its ai or not and I confess I didnt look back at other games but mostly I dont rrcall feeling this way reading ladds early posts. Also I was a bit disappointed by his final logic vote d1 (i do think its better to vote people with content, blame me).
Ender i do not have more to add I guess. Kinda of an ego read but he has the correct one on me when I felt there was so momemtum early D2 to build up my wagon ridding people bad pushes... which brings me to Sunbae.
I am still digesting their wall but the part about me is not charitable and misrepresenting to an extent. I get the willingness to read and make AI conclusions out of player moves, but the way they paint what I did around visor is not right. Like I didnt switch anything, i just miss remembered who he was pushing early D1, yet the conclusions held, like to me his early case on Cape was meh (I labelled it as "lazy" itt) and I quite didnt get the follow up with Vanta ww with Cape (as I said, in lieu of the other possibilities). If you were paying attention yo what I was saying, its clear I didnt "switch" anything, just missremembered who was the first visors push. And its pretty clear itt since I adressed the first case live, the second case live then misstyped when I sum up the reasons for my vote late D1.
It doesnt make suunbae lock wolf, but still uncharitable, borderline sloppy. Which is weird considering the effort they seem to put in the game (look that wall lmao).
Finishing some stuff (cover for me eating "viennoiseries") then Ill finish up my ketchup
Bookmarks