Quote Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (oldwarhorse @ Feb. 22 2003,02:06)]
Quote Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] ]i don`t think it would be boring.. i think the battles would take much longer and it could turn out to be very similar to the sid meier games (gettysburg) where you are constantly trying to outflank your opponent and hold the battle line i think it could be pretty cool
hmmm the no mans land (or however you call it O.o) was just a few miles....it would be boring coz
1. one side attacks with numerical superiority, wins like..say 100 yards with lots of casualties. then the beaten side counter attacks and takes back the 100 yards that was lost. they try to hold it but other side COUNTERATTACKS yet again, you see where im getting at?.
2. artillery, i dont suppose well see artillery on the map....since well theyre artillery . they were quite developed during that time.
3. gas, yes gas warfare needs to be in the game too for it to be historically correct. plus its kinda sad seeing your men drop like flies on machinegun fire