Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Ideas for Future Game Enhancements

  1. #1
    Member Member Goatus Maximus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    89

    Default

    I'm interesting in hearing what enhancements you guys would like to see in future TW games. Here's some suggestions I have:

    *Quick governor dropdown list. Shows only the governors for territories you control, with the following information: Current location, all stats (Command, Acumen, etc), +/- Vices/Virtues (ie 2+, 1-). Would be very helpful in the purging of bad generals I bet Stalin had it

    *Ability to reassign general to a different unit type. This should be accompanied with a penalty to command. But it would be nice to be able to take the recently bribed 8* enemy general in charge of 1 Kataphraktoi and assign him to a command of 20 Royal Knights, since you can't upgrade/replenish the Kataphraktoi.

    *Improved/Quicker scrolling ability through provences, agents, etc. Its tedious to find your emissaries, spies, etc in the end game when you have bishops and cardinals everywhere.

    Just a couple ideas for now...

  2. #2
    Member Member Div Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Defenceive structures other than the Fort/Castle ect like towers with their own small garrison. Or being able to occupy buildings (escpecially 2 story) for archers ect to fire from.
    Proud member of the Ravens

    I have an X-Box, it's where I keep all my x-girlfriends

  3. #3
    The Lordz Modding Collective Senior Member Lord Of Storms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Paisley,Florida
    Posts
    2,302

    Default

    I would like to see a more hands on approach to the diplomacy side of the game, give us more control and options in this area I think would be interesting...
    Taking life one day at a time!

  4. #4
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The ability to choose whether you trash a province or not - sometimes that is the only reason to attack, other times you wanna keep it, so you don't want to damage the buildings.
    This might be affected by the morale / discipline / size of the army that you are commanding / pay the men out of your own pocket not to go on an orgy of destruction.
    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  5. #5
    Member Member whiskeyjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    the depths of the bottle
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Definitely make the diplomacy side more involving. It would be really cool if you could form alliances with factions against specific factions where both of ye would work together in attack. Also maybe a tribute element i.e buying off more powerful neighbours. Also increase the functions of spies, at the moment they are pretty limited.

  6. #6

    Default

    greets all, still a newb

    personally i would like to see a refined supply line, meaning you set your supply route up, and then you have actual targets that become double strategical importance.
    is it friday yet?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO