Hey i've been thinking it would be cool to work harder on trying to build up generals. Right now I just wait for a 6 star general to magically be born, and never focus on the lower down leaders unless thats all i got. So i wanted to ask is there any official word on what the battles won to stars earned ratio is?
I read this in an earlier post about assasins gaining stars...
Can anyone confirm or disconfirm this?Originally Posted by [b
Everything seems sound until you want to get to 4 stars, 4 more battles is a lot. And then 5 or 6 stars? Thats way too much work. Anyone know for sure if this is how its done?
Oh and you know what would be cool, if units recorded where they had fought before. Sure valour is some indication, but with valour bonuses, provinces that naturally give valour and Vice/Virtue valour modifiers its hard to tell who actually earned their badass status.
I dunno, it just occured to me when i was thinking about trying to build up a general's stats that i would also be more likely to use units that had fought in many battles. It gives the whole thing a more personal touch i think, when you have some proof that these guys have fought for you before.
Bookmarks